Skip to content

Conversation

zerosnacks
Copy link
Member

@zerosnacks zerosnacks commented Aug 29, 2025

part of #101

also avoids any unnecessary insertions of chainid as query parameter for other verifiers (though they were tolerant of it)

Copy link
Member

@mattsse mattsse left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see, we added chainid directly to url

Comment on lines -197 to -199
if self.chain_id.is_some() && !self.url_contains_chainid() {
post_query.insert("chainid", self.chain_id.unwrap());
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

shouldnt this have caught it?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

it did and it was functional but this is no longer necessary as we now consistently use the V2 URLs

… instead - note the inclusion of chainid parameter in returned url
@zerosnacks zerosnacks merged commit 7fc6e27 into zerosnacks/drop-etherscan-v1-support Aug 29, 2025
8 checks passed
@zerosnacks zerosnacks deleted the zerosnacks/temp-test-drop-etherscan-v1 branch August 29, 2025 12:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants