Skip to content

Conversation

rfay
Copy link
Member

@rfay rfay commented Mar 10, 2023

@gilzow
Copy link
Collaborator

gilzow commented Mar 10, 2023

I dont know... jq is kind of a beast. 😄

@rfay
Copy link
Member Author

rfay commented Mar 10, 2023

It's just using jq in a lightweight container, so we don't have to worry about 1000 varieties of it.

@rfay rfay changed the title Use a lightweight docker image to replace fragile jq, shasum, etc, fixes #100, for #46 Use a lightweight docker image to replace fragile jq, shasum, etc, fixes #100, for #46, fixes #96 Mar 11, 2023
@rfay rfay changed the title Use a lightweight docker image to replace fragile jq, shasum, etc, fixes #100, for #46, fixes #96 Use a lightweight docker image to replace fragile jq, shasum, etc, fixes #100, for #46, fixes #96, fixes #93 Mar 11, 2023
@rfay rfay merged commit db1d810 into ddev:main Mar 11, 2023
@rfay rfay deleted the 20230310_no_more_jq_dependencies branch March 11, 2023 00:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants