Skip to content

Conversation

@sjarva
Copy link
Collaborator

@sjarva sjarva commented Oct 20, 2022

Checks

  • I have read the contributing guidelines.
  • If some rule is added/updated/removed, I've regenerated the rules list (npm run generate:rules-list)
  • If some rule meta info is changed, I've regenerated the plugin shared configs (npm run generate:configs)

Changes

  • change autofixer to keep wait query's second argument (options), previously this was lost in autofixing
  • fixing documentation formatting (code keywords and a dot)

Context

Solves half (part/scenario 1) of the issue #579

@sjarva sjarva requested a review from Belco90 October 20, 2022 17:45
@Belco90 Belco90 linked an issue Oct 20, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
@Belco90 Belco90 merged commit e31fe03 into main Oct 21, 2022
@Belco90 Belco90 deleted the pr/prefer-find-by-bug branch October 21, 2022 12:00
@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 5.9.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@github-actions
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 6.0.0-alpha.14 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

prefer-find-by autofix doesn't respect extra code

4 participants