Remove stsci.image dependency

[braingram]

stsci.image is listed as a dependency:

jwst/pyproject.toml

Line 40 in de39de0

"stsci.image>=2.3.5",

but is unused:
https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aspacetelescope%2Fjwst%20stsci.image&type=code

Regression tests with this PR show that stsci.image is not installed (so it is also not a non-primary dependency): https://plwishmaster.stsci.edu:8081/blue/organizations/jenkins/RT%2FJWST-Developers-Pull-Requests/detail/JWST-Developers-Pull-Requests/1611/pipeline#step-192-log-94

and all tests passed.

Fixes: #3576

Checklist for PR authors (skip items if you don't have permissions or they are not applicable)

• added entry in CHANGES.rst within the relevant release section
• updated or added relevant tests
• updated relevant documentation
• added relevant milestone
• added relevant label(s)
• ran regression tests, post a link to the Jenkins job below.
  How to run regression tests on a PR
• All comments are resolved
• Make sure the JIRA ticket is resolved properly

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 60.36%. Comparing base (4c50426) to head (155408f).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #8663   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   60.36%   60.36%           
=======================================
  Files         372      372           
  Lines       38325    38326    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits        23136    23137    +1     
  Misses      15189    15189           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[melanieclarke]

This looks fine to me - it looks like the last remaining use of stsci.image was removed with #7590.

Can you please fix the conflict with the change log?

[braingram]

Thanks for taking a look!

I can certainly resolve the changelog entry. Any objection to waiting until this is approved (as merging other PRs will likely re-introduce a changelog entry conflict until something like #8671 can be implemented)?

[melanieclarke]

No objection. I approve otherwise!

[braingram]

Thanks! Conflict fixed.

[braingram]

The build CI errors here are likely due to a new cibuildwheel which is by default building python 3.13 wheels (which are failing test for jwst).
https://github.com/pypa/cibuildwheel/releases/tag/v2.20.0

I opened a test PR here to make sure this isn't due to changes in this PR, it has the same build errors:
#8689

[melanieclarke]

Thanks for filing that - I noticed the failed builds this morning as well.

[braingram]

Thanks! Maybe we should finish support for 3.12 first 😆