Fix for Dockerfile smell DL3059 #951
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi!
The Dockerfile placed at "Dockerfile" contains the best practice violation DL3059 detected by the hadolint tool.
The smell DL3059 occurs if there are multiple consecutive RUN instructions. Each RUN will correspond to a layer of the final Docker image, thus is recommended to compact them to reduce the number of layers for the final image.
This pull request proposes a fix for that smell generated by my fixing tool. The patch was manually verified before opening the pull request. To fix this smell, specifically, The consecutive RUN instructions have been chained until a comment or a different instruction appears.
This change is only aimed at fixing that specific smell. If the fix is not valid or useful, please briefly indicate the reason and suggestions for possible improvements.
Thanks in advance