ci: add zizmor #1146
ci: add zizmor #1146
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Thegaram has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 1 minutes and 55 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughThe PR updates several GitHub Actions workflow files by explicitly defining permissions for various jobs and correcting minor mistakes. Changes include updating action versions, adding empty or specific permissions blocks, correcting typos, and introducing a new workflow for running Zizmor security analysis with steps for code checkout, tool installation, analysis execution, and SARIF report uploading. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Trigger as GitHub Trigger
participant W as Workflow Engine
participant Checkout as Checkout Action
participant Installer as UV Installer
participant Analyzer as Zizmor Analyzer
participant Uploader as SARIF Uploader
Trigger->>W: Trigger on push/PR
W->>Checkout: Checkout repository (v4)
Checkout-->>W: Code available
W->>Installer: Run astral-sh/setup-uv to install uv tool
Installer-->>W: uv tool installed
W->>Analyzer: Execute "uvx zizmor --format sarif ."
Analyzer-->>W: Generate SARIF results
W->>Uploader: Upload SARIF file via codeql-action
Uploader-->>W: SARIF file uploaded
Possibly related PRs
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/zizmor.yml (3)
1-2: Header and Workflow Name Clarity
The workflow name is clear and descriptive. Consider adding a brief comment at the top explaining the purpose of this workflow (e.g., running Zizmor security analysis) to aid future maintainers.
3-8: Event Triggers and Branch Filters
The workflow triggers on pushes to the "main" branch and pull requests for all branches. Please double-check if using"**"for pull_request branch filtering is intentional, as it effectively matches every branch.
35-35: Minor Formatting Note
A newline at the end of the file can improve readability and prevent potential issues with some tools.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
.github/workflows/bump_version.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/docker-arm64.yaml(2 hunks).github/workflows/docker.yaml(1 hunks).github/workflows/l2geth_ci.yml(7 hunks).github/workflows/semgrep.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/zizmor.yml(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: test
🔇 Additional comments (16)
.github/workflows/semgrep.yml (1)
18-18: Permissions Block AddedThe explicit addition of
permissions: {}for the semgrep job now clearly defines its permission context. This change aligns with the overall security approach and standardizes permission settings across workflows..github/workflows/bump_version.yml (2)
17-18: Explicit Permissions DeclarationThe addition of an empty
permissions: {}block in the try-to-bump job explicitly sets the job’s permission context. This consistency improves security clarity without changing the job behavior.
34-34: Echo Message CorrectionUpdating the echo statement to read "checking version changes in diff..." improves clarity by fixing the previous typographical error. Nice catch!
.github/workflows/docker-arm64.yaml (1)
14-14: Permissions Block for Docker-arm64 JobThe addition of
permissions: {}in the build-and-push-arm64-image job explicitly controls the job’s permissions. This update is consistent with other workflows and enhances security clarity..github/workflows/docker.yaml (1)
13-14: Defining Explicit PermissionsThe explicit inclusion of
permissions: {}in the build-and-push job ensures that the job’s permission context is clearly defined. This approach aligns with the updated security practices across all CI workflows..github/workflows/l2geth_ci.yml (6)
1-2: Workflow Naming UpdateThe workflow now includes the explicit name "CI" at the top. While this improves clarity, verify that using a generic name does not conflict with naming conventions for similar workflows.
21-21: Permissions Block for build-mock-ccc-geth JobAdding
permissions: {}here explicitly sets the permissions for the build-mock-ccc-geth job. This ensures a well-defined security context consistent with the rest of the workflows.
40-40: Permissions Block for build-geth JobThe insertion of
permissions: {}clarifies the permission settings for the build-geth job. Confirm that no additional permissions are needed for any step in this job.
68-68: Permissions Block for Check JobExplicitly declaring
permissions: {}for the check job establishes a consistent security baseline. This change follows the same pattern applied across the CI workflows.
115-115: Permissions Block for go-mod-tidy-lint JobThe addition of
permissions: {}for the go-mod-tidy-lint job ensures that its permission context is explicitly managed. This is in line with the overall improvements across the workflows.
139-139: Permissions Block for Test JobAdding an explicit
permissions: {}for the test job brings clarity by defining its operational context explicitly. This consistency across all jobs is beneficial..github/workflows/zizmor.yml (5)
9-15: Jobs Configuration and Permissions
The job "zizmor" is configured to run on the latest Ubuntu image with an explicit permissions block (security-events: write), which is a good security practice. Confirm if no further permissions are needed for subsequent steps.
16-21: Repository Checkout Step
Usingactions/checkout@v4withpersist-credentials: falseis appropriate for security. This step is implemented correctly.
22-24: UV Installation Step
The step to installuvuses a pinned commit (astral-sh/setup-uv@f94ec6bedd8674c4426838e6b50417d36b6ab231), ensuring reproducibility. Just remember to update the commit hash in the future when newer stable versions are available if needed.
25-29: Running Zizmor Analysis
The commanduvx zizmor --format sarif . > results.sarifappears correctly formed, and setting theGH_TOKENfrom secrets ensures secure authentication. Verify that the generatedresults.sariffile is in the expected location for the subsequent upload step.
30-34: SARIF File Upload Step
Uploading the SARIF file usinggithub/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3with the specified category "zizmor" is implemented correctly. It would be beneficial to ensure the file path remains consistent between steps in case of any directory changes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/bump_version.yml(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/bump_version.yml
18-18: unknown permission scope "content". all available permission scopes are "actions", "attestations", "checks", "contents", "deployments", "discussions", "id-token", "issues", "packages", "pages", "pull-requests", "repository-projects", "security-events", "statuses"
(permissions)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: test
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/bump_version.yml (1)
35-35: Echo Message Clarity ImprovementThe echo statement now correctly spells "version" (previously misspelled as "verion"), improving the clarity of log outputs.
1. Purpose or design rationale of this PR
Add GitHub Action static analysis tool recommended during the recent audit.
2. PR title
Your PR title must follow conventional commits (as we are doing squash merge for each PR), so it must start with one of the following types:
3. Deployment tag versioning
Has the version in
params/version.gobeen updated?4. Breaking change label
Does this PR have the
breaking-changelabel?Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores