Skip to content

Implement Tuple operation directly in the compiler #6539

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Jun 6, 2019
Merged

Implement Tuple operation directly in the compiler #6539

merged 11 commits into from
Jun 6, 2019

Conversation

@nicolasstucki
Copy link
Contributor

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki commented May 21, 2019 •
edited
Loading

In this PR we gain performance of compiling code with tuple operations. The improvements are split into two.

First, introduce some optimizations on the generated code to avoid generating code that is too large.

Second, implement all optimizations and check in the new TupleOptimizations miniphase. It performs the equivalent optimizations as the first part. It expands the later in the compilation pipeline which saves time in phases before TupleOptimizations (placed just before Erasure).

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki changed the title Tuple codegen in compiler Implement Tuple operation directly in the compiler May 21, 2019
@nicolasstucki
Copy link
Contributor Author

nicolasstucki commented May 21, 2019

test performance with #tuples please

@dottybot
Copy link
Member

dottybot commented May 21, 2019

performance test scheduled: 1 job(s) in queue, 0 running.

@dottybot
Copy link
Member

dottybot commented May 21, 2019

Performance test finished successfully:

Visit http://dotty-bench.epfl.ch/6539/ to see the changes.

Benchmarks is based on merging with master (fb6667b)

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki force-pushed the tuple-codegen-in-compiler branch 6 times, most recently from b12df61 to ab85854 Compare May 21, 2019 15:44
@nicolasstucki
Copy link
Contributor Author

nicolasstucki commented May 21, 2019

test performance with #tuples please

@dottybot
Copy link
Member

dottybot commented May 21, 2019

performance test scheduled: 1 job(s) in queue, 1 running.

@nicolasstucki
Copy link
Contributor Author

nicolasstucki commented May 21, 2019

test performance with #tuples please

@dottybot
Copy link
Member

dottybot commented May 21, 2019

performance test scheduled: 1 job(s) in queue, 1 running.

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki force-pushed the tuple-codegen-in-compiler branch from 05eaa84 to 68babe3 Compare May 21, 2019 16:50
@nicolasstucki
Copy link
Contributor Author

nicolasstucki commented May 21, 2019

test performance with #tuples please

@dottybot
Copy link
Member

dottybot commented May 21, 2019

performance test scheduled: 1 job(s) in queue, 1 running.

@dottybot
Copy link
Member

dottybot commented May 21, 2019

Performance test finished successfully:

Visit http://dotty-bench.epfl.ch/6539/ to see the changes.

Benchmarks is based on merging with master (3bcaf1d)

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki force-pushed the tuple-codegen-in-compiler branch 5 times, most recently from 09b778f to f677b4c Compare May 23, 2019 06:17
@nicolasstucki
Copy link
Contributor Author

nicolasstucki commented May 23, 2019

test performance with #tuples please

@dottybot
Copy link
Member

dottybot commented May 23, 2019

performance test scheduled: 1 job(s) in queue, 1 running.

@dottybot
Copy link
Member

dottybot commented May 23, 2019

Performance test finished successfully:

Visit http://dotty-bench.epfl.ch/6539/ to see the changes.

Benchmarks is based on merging with master (59e910a)

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki force-pushed the tuple-codegen-in-compiler branch from 5deb7e7 to 40b741c Compare May 23, 2019 08:10
@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki marked this pull request as ready for review May 23, 2019 08:38
@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki mentioned this pull request May 23, 2019
Merged
@nicolasstucki
Copy link
Contributor Author

nicolasstucki commented May 23, 2019

test performance with #tuples please

@dottybot
Copy link
Member

dottybot commented May 27, 2019

performance test scheduled: 1 job(s) in queue, 1 running.

@dottybot
Copy link
Member

dottybot commented May 27, 2019

Performance test finished successfully:

Visit http://dotty-bench.epfl.ch/6539/ to see the changes.

Benchmarks is based on merging with master (ba6a973)

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki requested review from OlivierBlanvillain and removed request for odersky May 28, 2019 15:41
odersky
odersky requested changes Jun 5, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@odersky odersky left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good overall. Just some minor changes needed.

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki requested a review from odersky June 5, 2019 17:30
@nicolasstucki
Improve performance of generic tuples code generation
1ee6602 
Improves the state of scala#6524.

Instead of convering all tuples to arrays and performing the operations on them,
we take advantage of the fact that those Tuples are products and have productIterators.
Implementations of tail, *: and ++ on iterators do not require extra collentions to be created,
hence it is also probably more performant at runtime.
@nicolasstucki
Avoid recomputing tuple size from type
ce50d3b
@nicolasstucki
Implement Tuple operation directly in the compiler
7666e03 
To increase the performance of compiling code with Tuple/NonEmptyTuple operations
@nicolasstucki
Implement Tuple.head as Tuple.apply(0)
2d9e6b9
@nicolasstucki
Add more documentation
a098e32
@nicolasstucki
Bound tuple sizes when possible
3ff85db
@nicolasstucki
Optimize some operations on TupleXXL
d2bc81f
@nicolasstucki
Add documentation
b3b3fb0
@nicolasstucki
Add missing bounds
c4fb0ac
@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki force-pushed the tuple-codegen-in-compiler branch from 515069d to e7a969f Compare June 5, 2019 18:30
@nicolasstucki
Copy link
Contributor Author

nicolasstucki commented Jun 5, 2019

Rebased

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki force-pushed the tuple-codegen-in-compiler branch from 3ba4b07 to 950ead1 Compare June 6, 2019 05:47
odersky
odersky approved these changes Jun 6, 2019
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@odersky odersky left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one more tweak and this is good to go.

@odersky odersky assigned nicolasstucki and unassigned odersky Jun 6, 2019
@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki merged commit 33ad06b into scala:master Jun 6, 2019
@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki deleted the tuple-codegen-in-compiler branch June 6, 2019 08:04
@biboudis biboudis added this to the 0.16 Tech Preview milestone Jun 7, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@odersky odersky odersky approved these changes

@OlivierBlanvillain OlivierBlanvillain Awaiting requested review from OlivierBlanvillain

Assignees

@nicolasstucki nicolasstucki

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

0.16 Tech Preview

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@nicolasstucki @dottybot @odersky @biboudis @OlivierBlanvillain