Skip to content

Conversation

@erikdesjardins
Copy link
Contributor

Should fix (untested) #94390

Reopens #46515, #87055

r? @ehuss

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Feb 26, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Some changes occured to rustc_codegen_gcc

cc @antoyo

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Feb 26, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@ehuss
Copy link
Contributor

ehuss commented Feb 26, 2022

r? @nagisa

I am not on the compiler team, so I'm not the appropriate person to review this.

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned nagisa and unassigned ehuss Feb 26, 2022
@nagisa
Copy link
Member

nagisa commented Feb 26, 2022

@bors r+

I'm not sure Reopens does anything, so I went ahead and reopened them manually.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 26, 2022

📌 Commit 45cc025dc6a0f1ad9bfc871d681bbf89492fdc1b has been approved by nagisa

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 26, 2022
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

@bors rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 27, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 45cc025dc6a0f1ad9bfc871d681bbf89492fdc1b with merge 356f72f628f5edf19815d1aa1cf0a8d62c51a178...

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 27, 2022

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Feb 27, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Feb 27, 2022

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #94221) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@Dylan-DPC
Copy link
Member

@bors r=nagisa

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 1, 2022

📌 Commit 0c78433 has been approved by nagisa

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 1, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 1, 2022

⌛ Testing commit 0c78433 with merge 4a56cbe...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Mar 1, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: nagisa
Pushing 4a56cbe to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Mar 1, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 4a56cbe into rust-lang:master Mar 1, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.61.0 milestone Mar 1, 2022
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (4a56cbe): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run shows 9 relevant improvements 🎉 but 152 relevant regressions 😿 to instruction counts.

  • Arithmetic mean of relevant regressions: 0.7%
  • Arithmetic mean of relevant improvements: -1.7%
  • Arithmetic mean of all relevant changes: 0.5%
  • Largest improvement in instruction counts: -3.8% on full builds of ripgrep opt
  • Largest regression in instruction counts: 3.3% on full builds of syn opt

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this perf run, please indicate this with @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged along with sufficient written justification. If you cannot justify the regressions please open an issue or create a new PR that fixes the regressions, add a comment linking to the newly created issue or PR, and then add the perf-regression-triaged label to this PR.

@rustbot label: +perf-regression

@rustbot rustbot added the perf-regression Performance regression. label Mar 1, 2022
@erikdesjardins erikdesjardins deleted the revert-coldland branch March 1, 2022 17:42
TaKO8Ki added a commit to TaKO8Ki/rust that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2023
…=nikic

Rebased: Mark drop calls in landing pads cold instead of noinline

I noticed that certain inlining optimizations were missing while staring at some compiled code output. I'd like to see this relanded, so I rebased the PR from ``@erikdesjardins`` (PR rust-lang#94823).

This PR reapplies rust-lang#92419, which was reverted in rust-lang#94402 due to rust-lang#94390.

Fixes rust-lang#46515, fixes rust-lang#87055.

Update: fixes rust-lang#97217.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2023
…ikic

Rebased: Mark drop calls in landing pads cold instead of noinline

I noticed that certain inlining optimizations were missing while staring at some compiled code output. I'd like to see this relanded, so I rebased the PR from `@erikdesjardins` (PR rust-lang#94823).

This PR reapplies rust-lang#92419, which was reverted in rust-lang#94402 due to rust-lang#94390.

Fixes rust-lang#46515, fixes rust-lang#87055.

Update: fixes rust-lang#97217.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2023
…ikic

Rebased: Mark drop calls in landing pads cold instead of noinline

I noticed that certain inlining optimizations were missing while staring at some compiled code output. I'd like to see this relanded, so I rebased the PR from `@erikdesjardins` (PR rust-lang#94823).

This PR reapplies rust-lang#92419, which was reverted in rust-lang#94402 due to rust-lang#94390.

Fixes rust-lang#46515, fixes rust-lang#87055.

Update: fixes rust-lang#97217.
antoyo pushed a commit to rust-lang/rustc_codegen_gcc that referenced this pull request Oct 8, 2023
Rebased: Mark drop calls in landing pads cold instead of noinline

I noticed that certain inlining optimizations were missing while staring at some compiled code output. I'd like to see this relanded, so I rebased the PR from `@erikdesjardins` (PR #94823).

This PR reapplies rust-lang/rust#92419, which was reverted in rust-lang/rust#94402 due to rust-lang/rust#94390.

Fixes rust-lang/rust#46515, fixes rust-lang/rust#87055.

Update: fixes #97217.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. perf-regression Performance regression. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants