Skip to content

Conversation

@scottmcm
Copy link
Member

Hopefully-non-controversial changes from some not-ready-yet work that I'd figured I'd submit on their own.

Hopefully-non-controversial changes from some not-ready-yet work that I'd figured I'd submit on their own.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @michaelwoerister

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Nov 27, 2021
@michaelwoerister
Copy link
Member

r? rust-lang/mir-opt

@apiraino apiraino added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Dec 1, 2021
@nagisa
Copy link
Member

nagisa commented Dec 5, 2021

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 5, 2021

📌 Commit b215a32 has been approved by nagisa

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 5, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 5, 2021

⌛ Testing commit b215a32 with merge ecb65b0e170fc5275870c9d0fba7267a57cf35e5...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 6, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: nagisa
Pushing ecb65b0e170fc5275870c9d0fba7267a57cf35e5 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 6, 2021
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 6, 2021

👀 Test was successful, but fast-forwarding failed: 422 Update is not a fast forward

@scottmcm
Copy link
Member Author

scottmcm commented Dec 6, 2021

Well, this passed, so might as well just put it in a
@bors rollup

but it probably also needs a
@bors retry

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (ecb65b0e170fc5275870c9d0fba7267a57cf35e5): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant changes.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 6, 2021

⌛ Testing commit b215a32 with merge 0fb1c37...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 6, 2021

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: nagisa
Pushing 0fb1c37 to master...

@bors bors merged commit 0fb1c37 into rust-lang:master Dec 6, 2021
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.59.0 milestone Dec 6, 2021
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (0fb1c37): comparison url.

Summary: This benchmark run did not return any relevant changes.

If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf.

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants