Fix std::getopts::opts_present() to check value. #5329
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Currently the opts_present() function only checks to see if the option is
configured in the match, but doesn't actually check to see if the option
value has been set. This means that opt_present('h') may return false while
opts_present([~'h']) returns true.
Add a test case to catch this condition and fix opts_present() to check
the value before returning true.
Note, there is another API difference between these two functions that this
does not address. Currently if you pass a non-configured option to
opt_present() the program will fail!(), but opts_present() simply returns
false. If it is acceptable to standardize on the fail!() then opts_present()
should probably be implemented in terms of the opt_present() function.
Contributor
Author
|
Sounds good. I can pursue using conditions in a separate pull request. Would you like all Thanks. |
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 12, 2013
…ydon
Currently the opts_present() function only checks to see if the option is
configured in the match, but doesn't actually check to see if the option
value has been set. This means that opt_present('h') may return false while
opts_present([~'h']) returns true.
Add a test case to catch this condition and fix opts_present() to check
the value before returning true.
Note, there is another API difference between these two functions that this
does not address. Currently if you pass a non-configured option to
opt_present() the program will fail!(), but opts_present() simply returns
false. If it is acceptable to standardize on the fail!() then opts_present()
should probably be implemented in terms of the opt_present() function.
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2020
…flip1995 integer_arithmetic: detect integer arithmetic on references. changelog: integer_arithmetic fix false negatives with references on integers Fixes rust-lang#5328
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Currently the opts_present() function only checks to see if the option is
configured in the match, but doesn't actually check to see if the option
value has been set. This means that opt_present('h') may return false while
opts_present([~'h']) returns true.
Add a test case to catch this condition and fix opts_present() to check
the value before returning true.
Note, there is another API difference between these two functions that this
does not address. Currently if you pass a non-configured option to
opt_present() the program will fail!(), but opts_present() simply returns
false. If it is acceptable to standardize on the fail!() then opts_present()
should probably be implemented in terms of the opt_present() function.