Split MinGW tests into two builders on AppVeyor #48487
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Run-pass and compile-fail tests appear to take the most significant chunk of time, so split them into their own builder.
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Member
Author
|
@bors r+ p=120 I'm going to go ahead and self-approve this as appveyor timeouts are a major cause of CI slowdown right now and I don't believe there's any problems with this. |
Collaborator
|
📌 Commit 91fbefa has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Collaborator
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 24, 2018
Split MinGW tests into two builders on AppVeyor Run-pass and compile-fail tests appear to take the most significant chunk of time, so split them into their own builder. Should help with #46903. r? @kennytm cc @alexcrichton
Collaborator
|
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Run-pass and compile-fail tests appear to take the most significant chunk of time, so split them into their own builder.
Should help with #46903.
r? @kennytm
cc @alexcrichton