Skip to content

Conversation

@weihanglo
Copy link
Member

TODO: stabilization report?

r? rustdoc

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Sep 5, 2025
@weihanglo
Copy link
Member Author

Questions:

  • Do we want to stabilize also unversioned-shared-resources option? It currently does nothing AFAIK.
  • Do we want a stabilization report?
  • How many details do we want to put in doc?

@weihanglo
Copy link
Member Author

cc @aDotInTheVoid since you've involved in the PR removing the last blocker :)

@weihanglo weihanglo marked this pull request as ready for review September 24, 2025 19:21
@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. labels Sep 24, 2025
@fmease fmease added the needs-fcp This change is insta-stable, or significant enough to need a team FCP to proceed. label Oct 13, 2025
@notriddle notriddle self-assigned this Oct 13, 2025
@GuillaumeGomez
Copy link
Member

We discussed on today's rustdoc meeting. Before going any further, we will investigate exactly what each --emit option does exactly to have a clearer picture of what's actually needed and also to add missing documentation.

@weihanglo
Copy link
Member Author

We discussed on today's rustdoc meeting. Before going any further, we will investigate exactly what each --emit option does exactly to have a clearer picture of what's actually needed and also to add missing documentation.

Thanks for it!

This PR contains a doc based on my understanding and the history of these options, but I am not 100% sure if that is correct

@rustbot

This comment has been minimized.

@fmease
Copy link
Member

fmease commented Oct 25, 2025

I haven't read this yet but here are probably some very important and relevant considerations: #83784.

@weihanglo
Copy link
Member Author

For the use case in Cargo, we actually don't need anything other than dep-info. The originak ask was here: #t-rustdoc > Plan to stabilize `--emit=dep-info[=path]` @ 💬:

One thing that might be a blocker: rust-lang/cargo#15605

Do we want to stabilize the --emit flag with all the emit types, or just dep-info? At this moment it is required for cargo to pass --emit=toolchain-shared-resources,invocation-specific,dep-info=<PATH> in order to make the generated doc look good and styled.

I guess one way forward is that rustdoc provides an extra emit type, say, default. So that cargo can run --emit=default,dep-info=/path/to/foo.d without even considering those other options. And in rustdoc documentation we can state that the default emit type is whatever the default emits rustdoc is doing. Pretty much like --remap-path-scope=all:

all - an alias for all of the above, also equivalent to supplying only --remap-path-prefix without --remap-path-scope.

notriddle added a commit to notriddle/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2025
This option hasn't done anything for a long time, and can be
removed. I've kept a shim in place to avoid breaking docs.rs,
but the option no longer does anything.

Using git-blame, I tracked this option down to
f77ebd4, the commit that
introduced EmitType in the first place. It was used with
SharedResource::Unversioned, which no longer exists since
f9e1f6f removed them.

Part of rust-lang#146220
@notriddle
Copy link
Contributor

I've opened #148180, a follow-up that removes the no-op unversioned-shared-resources, which hasn't done anything ever since we switched to using hashes for cache busting.

notriddle added a commit to notriddle/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2025
This option hasn't done anything for a long time, and can be
removed. I've kept a shim in place to avoid breaking docs.rs,
but the option no longer does anything.

Using git-blame, I tracked this option down to
f77ebd4, the commit that
introduced EmitType in the first place. It was used with
SharedResource::Unversioned, which no longer exists since
f9e1f6f removed them.

CC rust-lang#146220
Part of rust-lang#83784
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Oct 27, 2025

This PR was rebased onto a different master commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed.

Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers.

notriddle added a commit to notriddle/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2025
This option hasn't done anything for a long time, and can be
removed. I've kept a shim in place to avoid breaking docs.rs,
but the option no longer does anything.

Using git-blame, I tracked this option down to
f77ebd4, the commit that
introduced EmitType in the first place. It was used with
SharedResource::Unversioned, which no longer exists since
f9e1f6f removed them.

CC rust-lang#146220
Part of rust-lang#83784
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2025
…rces, r=GuillaumeGomez

rustdoc: remove `--emit=unversioned-shared-resources`

This option hasn't done anything for a long time, and can be removed. I've kept a shim in place to avoid breaking docs.rs, but the option no longer does anything.

Using git-blame, I tracked this option down to
f77ebd4, the commit that introduced EmitType in the first place. It was used with SharedResource::Unversioned, which no longer exists since f9e1f6f removed them.

CC rust-lang#146220
Part of rust-lang#83784
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2025
Rollup merge of #148180 - notriddle:unversioned-shared-resources, r=GuillaumeGomez

rustdoc: remove `--emit=unversioned-shared-resources`

This option hasn't done anything for a long time, and can be removed. I've kept a shim in place to avoid breaking docs.rs, but the option no longer does anything.

Using git-blame, I tracked this option down to
f77ebd4, the commit that introduced EmitType in the first place. It was used with SharedResource::Unversioned, which no longer exists since f9e1f6f removed them.

CC #146220
Part of #83784
Copy link
Member Author

@weihanglo weihanglo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This PR has updated and removed the unversioned-shared-resources option, which was removed in #148180

View changes since this review

GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2025
…=GuillaumeGomez

rustdoc: fix `--emit=dep-info` on scraped examples

Makes sure both stages (the scraping process itself, and the doc build) emit complete dependency lists.

CC rust-lang#146220
Part of rust-lang#83784
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2025
…=GuillaumeGomez

rustdoc: fix `--emit=dep-info` on scraped examples

Makes sure both stages (the scraping process itself, and the doc build) emit complete dependency lists.

CC rust-lang#146220
Part of rust-lang#83784
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2025
…=GuillaumeGomez

rustdoc: fix `--emit=dep-info` on scraped examples

Makes sure both stages (the scraping process itself, and the doc build) emit complete dependency lists.

CC rust-lang#146220
Part of rust-lang#83784
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2025
Rollup merge of #148268 - notriddle:emit-scraped-examples, r=GuillaumeGomez

rustdoc: fix `--emit=dep-info` on scraped examples

Makes sure both stages (the scraping process itself, and the doc build) emit complete dependency lists.

CC #146220
Part of #83784
github-actions bot pushed a commit to rust-lang/miri that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2025
…eGomez

rustdoc: fix `--emit=dep-info` on scraped examples

Makes sure both stages (the scraping process itself, and the doc build) emit complete dependency lists.

CC rust-lang/rust#146220
Part of rust-lang/rust#83784
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

needs-fcp This change is insta-stable, or significant enough to need a team FCP to proceed. S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants