Skip to content

Conversation

@petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

It's not currently load bearing in typical setups on typical targets.
Basically, if it passes the standard CI, then we can remove it, I think.

If someone later reports this breaking the build, then we can address it in a more fine grained way.
E.g. add it to PATH last and not first, only on specific targets, and only if specific files are not already found in PATH directories.

Fixes #t-infra/bootstrap > Build broken in MSYS2 @ 💬

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 27, 2025

r? @clubby789

rustbot has assigned @clubby789.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap) labels May 27, 2025
Copy link
Member

@jieyouxu jieyouxu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems reasonable. If someone ends up complaining... revert is an option.

@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

r? jieyouxu @bors r+ rollup=iffy

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 27, 2025

📌 Commit 043b164 has been approved by jieyouxu

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@rustbot rustbot assigned jieyouxu and unassigned clubby789 May 27, 2025
@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 27, 2025
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 30, 2025

⌛ Testing commit 043b164 with merge 70b3f46...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 30, 2025

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jieyouxu
Pushing 70b3f46 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label May 30, 2025
@bors bors merged commit 70b3f46 into rust-lang:master May 30, 2025
8 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.89.0 milestone May 30, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

What is this? This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 15825b7 (parent) -> 70b3f46 (this PR)

Test differences

No test diffs found

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
    test-dashboard 70b3f4666e24ce22fc32f5e357dbcf85d3254e63 --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

  1. dist-aarch64-apple: 4819.7s -> 6340.1s (31.5%)
  2. x86_64-apple-1: 10726.8s -> 7386.1s (-31.1%)
  3. dist-apple-various: 10260.3s -> 7457.8s (-27.3%)
  4. dist-x86_64-msvc-alt: 8772.5s -> 7360.1s (-16.1%)
  5. dist-x86_64-apple: 9551.7s -> 11027.0s (15.4%)
  6. aarch64-apple: 5648.4s -> 5067.7s (-10.3%)
  7. dist-riscv64-linux: 5734.1s -> 5258.8s (-8.3%)
  8. dist-aarch64-linux: 5312.7s -> 5672.6s (6.8%)
  9. dist-x86_64-illumos: 5729.7s -> 6111.5s (6.7%)
  10. x86_64-gnu-aux: 5915.3s -> 5616.2s (-5.1%)
How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (70b3f46): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.6% [0.6%, 0.6%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary 0.2%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.7% [0.4%, 0.9%] 6
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-0.6% [-0.7%, -0.4%] 4
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Cycles

Results (secondary 0.3%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
0.7% [0.5%, 1.2%] 12
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-1.0% [-1.4%, -0.7%] 4
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 778.613s -> 778.921s (0.04%)
Artifact size: 370.16 MiB -> 370.25 MiB (0.02%)

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 7, 2025
bootstrap: Remove `rustc_snapshot_libdir` from PATH in one more place

Same as #141657 but in a different part of the build system, with the same goal of addressing [#t-infra/bootstrap > Build broken in MSYS2 @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/Build.20broken.20in.20MSYS2/near/520709527).

It seems to work on windows-{gnu,msvc} and linux-gnu at least.

r? jieyouxu
github-actions bot pushed a commit to rust-lang/miri that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2025
bootstrap: Remove `rustc_snapshot_libdir` from PATH in one more place

Same as rust-lang/rust#141657 but in a different part of the build system, with the same goal of addressing [#t-infra/bootstrap > Build broken in MSYS2 @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/Build.20broken.20in.20MSYS2/near/520709527).

It seems to work on windows-{gnu,msvc} and linux-gnu at least.

r? jieyouxu
github-actions bot pushed a commit to rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2025
bootstrap: Remove `rustc_snapshot_libdir` from PATH in one more place

Same as rust-lang/rust#141657 but in a different part of the build system, with the same goal of addressing [#t-infra/bootstrap > Build broken in MSYS2 @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/Build.20broken.20in.20MSYS2/near/520709527).

It seems to work on windows-{gnu,msvc} and linux-gnu at least.

r? jieyouxu
lnicola pushed a commit to lnicola/rust-analyzer that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2025
bootstrap: Remove `rustc_snapshot_libdir` from PATH in one more place

Same as rust-lang/rust#141657 but in a different part of the build system, with the same goal of addressing [#t-infra/bootstrap > Build broken in MSYS2 @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/Build.20broken.20in.20MSYS2/near/520709527).

It seems to work on windows-{gnu,msvc} and linux-gnu at least.

r? jieyouxu
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-bootstrap Relevant to the bootstrap subteam: Rust's build system (x.py and src/bootstrap)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants