Add missing FileAPI support for documents #19897
Merged
+7
−4
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dosubot
bot
added
the
size:S
AstraBert
reviewed
Sep 19, 2025
...index-integrations/llms/llama-index-llms-google-genai/llama_index/llms/google_genai/utils.py
Show resolved
Hide resolved
frankiekim5
pushed a commit
to frankiekim5/bedrock-agentcore-memory
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 24, 2025
* Add missing FileAPI support for documents * Bump version to 5.0.1 --------- Co-authored-by: Florian-BACHO <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Following PR #19853, I noticed that I forgot to add FileAPI support for the
DocumentBlocktype.This PR adds this support.
Version Bump?
Did I bump the version in the
pyproject.tomlfile of the package I am updating? (Except for thellama-index-corepackage)Type of Change
Please delete options that are not relevant.
How Has This Been Tested?
Your pull-request will likely not be merged unless it is covered by some form of impactful unit testing.
Suggested Checklist:
uv run make format; uv run make lintto appease the lint gods