Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Thanks for the suggestion! I agree, this is more efficient, and definitely more elegant. I don't know why I had issues with it before. I'm updating it via #775

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by rasbt
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants