-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Replace SwapPermutationReplacer with cirq.map_operations
#5655
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
| # as well, we allow this to be passed in. This compiler is not allowed to | ||
| # change the order of the qubits. | ||
| return CompilationResult( | ||
| circuit=compiler(swap_networks[0].circuit), mapping=mapping, parity_map=parity_map |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why was swap_networks[0].circuit being passed in in the first place instead of routed_circuit?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Because the original optimizer mutated the circuit. routed_circuit was a variable storing a reference to swap_networks[0].circuit and since the underlying circuit was being mutated; it didn't matter whether you pass swap_networks[0].circuit or routed_circuit.
Now, routed_circuit stores a modified copy of swap_networks[0].circuit and therefore we need to pass routed_circuit instead of swap_networks[0].circuit.
vtomole
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Part of #5028
Since
SwapPermutationReplaceris not exposed outside the file, we don't need to go through the deprecation cycle