Skip to content

Conversation

AlexWaygood
Copy link
Member

@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood commented Oct 15, 2025

Unfortunately, this leads to 3/4 type checkers in this list advertising themselves as "fast", which feels a bit silly... ideally I'd put more information here about how ty tries to distinguish itself from the other two fast type checkers, but it feels unfair to have a more verbose description for ty than is afforded to the other three type checkers here :-)

We could also just get rid of the descriptions for all four type checkers; I think it would probably be fine to say that readers of these docs have to go elsewhere to try to decide which tool is right for them

Copy link
Collaborator

@hauntsaninja hauntsaninja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, the descriptions just seem not helpful. I would remove them entirely. We should also mention zuban

@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood changed the title Add ty to the list of type checkers that exist Add ty and Zuban to the list of type checkers that exist Oct 15, 2025
@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood merged commit a9173dc into main Oct 15, 2025
5 checks passed
@AlexWaygood AlexWaygood deleted the ty-exists branch October 15, 2025 20:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants