update governance after election and add discourse team

[OriolAbril]

Follow up of https://discourse.pymc.io/t/steering-council-election-results/8391

Maybe I should have splitted the PR in two but I have not. The request discussion label is not for the election results but for the team permissions and so on we defined, do we want to enforce that? Should we change it or remove it instead? We should probably make sure everyone is listed as part of the teams they want and in the roles they should have.

Note that after merging this PR I'll do my best to enforce it, so things not being right here will probably mean people losing access or permissions they should still have.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #5238 (355b920) into main (95bd5e5) will increase coverage by 0.07%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5238      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   78.94%   79.02%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          88       87       -1     
  Lines       14237    14376     +139     
==========================================
+ Hits        11240    11360     +120     
- Misses       2997     3016      +19     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pymc/backends/ndarray.py	79.64% <0.00%> (-9.74%)	⬇️
pymc/bart/utils.py	82.60% <0.00%> (-5.92%)	⬇️
pymc/backends/report.py	89.51% <0.00%> (-2.10%)	⬇️
pymc/distributions/dist_math.py	86.78% <0.00%> (-0.92%)	⬇️
pymc/sampling.py	86.23% <0.00%> (-0.57%)	⬇️
pymc/gp/gp.py	93.18% <0.00%> (-0.43%)	⬇️
pymc/smc/smc.py	97.89% <0.00%> (-0.41%)	⬇️
pymc/backends/arviz.py	89.16% <0.00%> (-0.40%)	⬇️
pymc/plots/__init__.py	95.65% <0.00%> (-0.19%)	⬇️
pymc/util.py	74.83% <0.00%> (-0.17%)	⬇️
... and 14 more

[OriolAbril]

main todo: add community team membership indicators

[cluhmann]

I think there may be related changes needed to docs/community_diagram.png to bring it inline with these changes?

[OriolAbril]

I think there may be related changes needed to docs/community_diagram.png to bring it inline with these changes?

I think the idea is still clear enough? I can do it but I'd rather do it after a while in case we end up creating some more teams like pymcon one maybe

[canyon289]

@junpenglao @fonnesbeck any comment, if not lets merge this in 72 hours

[OriolAbril]

Let's make it 6 better maybe, 3 days would include only 31st, 1st and a Sunday. I wouldn't expect anyone to answer really

[fonnesbeck]

Looks great. Just one clarification requested and a couple of nit-picks.

[OriolAbril]

The PR didn't yet reflect what we discussed at the meeting yesterday. I'll open a follow up to fix it