Skip to content

About compression: is it normal for it to be so low? #143

@aborruso

Description

@aborruso

Hi,
I'm testing gpq on the official administrative boundaries of Italy. The source file is this zip file:
https://www.istat.it/storage/cartografia/confini_amministrativi/non_generalizzati/2023/Limiti01012023.zip

It has a folder structure, with shapefiles in it. I am doing the tests on the Limiti01012023/Com01012023/Com01012023_WGS84.shp file:

  • I convert it to geojson using ogr2ogr;
  • using this geojson I create a gzip compressed geoparquet file, it has the size of 70 MB
  • using the same geojson I create an uncompressed geoparquet file, it has the size of 76 MB

They are almost equal in size. Some notes:

  • if I gzip the uncompressed parquet file I get a 57 MB file
  • if I create a sozip shp version of the source file, I get a 59 MB file

I know, I can't compare these outputs, however, it seems to me very limited compression in gpq output. Is it normal?
Am I doing something wrong?

Below the way I have tested all.

Thank you

wget -O file.zip "https://www.istat.it/storage/cartografia/confini_amministrativi/non_generalizzati/2023/Limiti01012023.zip"

unzip -o file.zip -d .

ogr2ogr -f GeoJSON -t_srs EPSG:4326 comuni.geojson Limiti01012023/Com01012023/Com01012023_WGS84.shp -lco "RFC7946=YES"

gpq convert --compression="gzip" --max 1000 --from="geojson" comuni.geojson comuni_compressed.parquet

gpq convert --compression="uncompressed" --max 1000 --from="geojson" comuni.geojson comuni_uncompressed.parquet

ogr2ogr -t_srs EPSG:4326 Com01012023_WGS84.shp.zip Limiti01012023/Com01012023/Com01012023_WGS84.shp

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions