Skip to content

Conversation

@louisgreiner
Copy link
Collaborator

@emersion emersion self-requested a review November 7, 2025 00:01
Copy link

@clarani clarani left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but I will let @emersion confirm :)

@emersion
Copy link
Member

I'm not a huge fan of exposing IDs to the user, but a proper way to fix this would be more involved.

We still trip over when the user renames a node to a trigram already used by another node.

@louisgreiner
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I agree the fix is not clean at all and should be temporary. Anyway, this could temporary help users to use the macro view with less bugs

What do you think @maelysLeratRosso of having such a fix, since a solid feature will fix this anyway in the few weeks/months?

@maelysLeratRosso
Copy link

What do the ids look like ?

@emersion
Copy link
Member

In NGE, IDs are arbitrary monotonically increasing integers. This PR would set default trigrams to e.g. id42.

@maelysLeratRosso
Copy link

Ok so temporarily it seems ok ? id42 is not too ugly

@louisgreiner
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Enregistrement.de.l.ecran.2025-11-19.115033.mp4

@louisgreiner louisgreiner merged commit dcd3225 into standalone Nov 24, 2025
5 of 7 checks passed
@louisgreiner louisgreiner deleted the lgr/hack-node-names branch November 24, 2025 10:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

error when creating multiple nodes in macro mode

5 participants