Lab 2 error

[al-heisner]

There's no error in Lab 2's PAYROLL0X source. I did a diff on the two source files looking to see what changed, nothing in reference to GROSS-PAY was changed in the source file that was supposed to produce compile error.

[Sudharsana-Srinivasan]

We are working on this... thank you for capturing it here

[kas1830]

There's no error in Lab 2's PAYROLL0X source. I did a diff on the two source files looking to see what changed, nothing in reference to GROSS-PAY was changed in the source file that was supposed to produce compile error.

check PIC 9(5) vs PIC X(5)

[al-heisner]

I'm sure that was the intention, but neither source file in the github repository has PIC X(5). Both contain PIC 9(5).

…

On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 2:55 PM kas1830 ***@***.***> wrote: There's no error in Lab 2's PAYROLL0X source. I did a diff on the two source files looking to see what changed, nothing in reference to GROSS-PAY was changed in the source file that was supposed to produce compile error. check PIC 9(5) vs PIC X(5) — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#21 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACXGIKANIFVI4GMCJ34NHOTRNNJJTANCNFSM4MIDQHKA> .

[paulnewt]

lab corrected

[timretout]

@paulnewt I've just run into this issue, having uploaded the files myself from git - is it possible you have fixed this on the lab mainframe, but not in this source repository?