Skip to content

Conversation

bryce-b
Copy link
Member

@bryce-b bryce-b commented Mar 7, 2025

Fixes #721
a 'virtual' protocol is not viable in this situation because the member variables and extension functions need variable visibility, both internal and public

@bryce-b
Copy link
Member Author

bryce-b commented Mar 7, 2025

@angelodipaolo would you mind giving this PR a try?

@bryce-b bryce-b marked this pull request as draft March 7, 2025 00:22
@angelodipaolo
Copy link
Contributor

@bryce-b Tested and works great. Thanks for fixing this so quickly!

@bryce-b bryce-b force-pushed the refactor-InstrumentBuilder branch from c7275fe to 8b0ba9c Compare March 7, 2025 16:43
@bryce-b bryce-b marked this pull request as ready for review March 10, 2025 22:36
@bryce-b bryce-b merged commit e5c6a8a into main Mar 10, 2025
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

InstrumentBuilder incorrectly marked as internal
3 participants