pedanticPropertyLookup

[Kingwl]

Search Terms

type check

Suggestion

As https://gist.github.com/RyanCavanaugh/f80f9ddc50d45c4d76e7c4101efada28 said.

To turn off allowing expr.prop when expr just has a string index signature.

But does it's better if only issue errors when property access referenced to signature?

Examples

interface A {
    foo: string
}
interface B {
    [k: string]: string
}
interface C {
    foo: string
    [k: string]: string
}
declare const a: A;
declare const b: B;
declare const c: C;
declare const d: C | undefined;
a.foo;
a["foo"]
b.foo; // error
b["foo"];
c.foo;
c["foo"]
c.bar; // error
c["bar"];
d?.foo;
d?.["foo"]
d?.bar; // error
d?.["bar"];

Checklist

My suggestion meets these guidelines:

• This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
• This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
• This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
• This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
• This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.