Skip to content

Conversation

@scala-steward
Copy link
Contributor

Updates org.scala-sbt:sbt from 1.5.8 to 1.6.1.
GitHub Release Notes - Version Diff

I'll automatically update this PR to resolve conflicts as long as you don't change it yourself.

If you'd like to skip this version, you can just close this PR. If you have any feedback, just mention me in the comments below.

Configure Scala Steward for your repository with a .scala-steward.conf file.

Have a fantastic day writing Scala!

Ignore future updates

Add this to your .scala-steward.conf file to ignore future updates of this dependency:

updates.ignore = [ { groupId = "org.scala-sbt", artifactId = "sbt" } ]

labels: library-update, early-semver-minor, semver-spec-minor, commit-count:1

@SethTisue
Copy link
Contributor

SethTisue commented Jan 13, 2022

@eed3si9n it looks like this might be some incompatibility between sbt 1.6.1 and Scala 2.12.4 specifically

if I only care about this repo, I would avoid the fishing expedition and just drop 2.12.4 (and 0 through 3 too) from the crossbuild... I really don't think genjavadoc needs to keep supporting weird old 2.12.x versions

but I thought I'd check first if this failure interests you

[error] ## Exception when compiling 9 sources to /home/runner/work/genjavadoc/genjavadoc/target/scala-2.12/classes
[error] java.lang.StackOverflowError
[error] scala.reflect.macros.Attachments.get(Attachments.scala:42)
[error] xsbt.Compat$OriginalTreeTraverser$Reflective$.traverseOriginal(Compat.scala:48)
[error] xsbt.Compat.processOriginalTreeAttachment(Compat.scala:25)
[error] xsbt.ExtractUsedNames$ExtractUsedNamesTraverser.handleClassicTreeNode(ExtractUsedNames.scala:294)
[error] xsbt.ExtractUsedNames$ExtractUsedNamesTraverser.traverse(ExtractUsedNames.scala:170)
[error] xsbt.ExtractUsedNames$ExtractUsedNamesTraverser.$anonfun$handleClassicTreeNode$3(ExtractUsedNames.scala:294)

@scala-steward
Copy link
Contributor Author

Superseded by #310.

@scala-steward scala-steward deleted the update/sbt-1.6.1 branch February 1, 2022 16:18
@SethTisue SethTisue mentioned this pull request Feb 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants