Skip to content

docs: improve GWC GatewayClassReasonInvalidParameters reason description #3553

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025
Merged

docs: improve GWC GatewayClassReasonInvalidParameters reason description #3553

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 23, 2025

Conversation

mlavacca
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

/kind documentation

What this PR does / why we need it:

The description for the GatewayClassReasonInvalidParameters GatewayClass reason has been improved.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jan 14, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jan 14, 2025
shaneutt
shaneutt approved these changes Jan 14, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@shaneutt shaneutt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

robscott
robscott approved these changes Jan 15, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@robscott robscott left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @mlavacca!

@mlavacca mlavacca requested a review from robscott January 15, 2025 11:03
shaneutt
shaneutt approved these changes Jan 23, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@shaneutt shaneutt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 23, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mlavacca, robscott, shaneutt

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [mlavacca,robscott,shaneutt]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 79b71d2 into kubernetes-sigs:main Jan 23, 2025
13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@shaneutt shaneutt shaneutt approved these changes

@robscott robscott Awaiting requested review from robscott

Assignees

@shaneutt shaneutt

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@mlavacca @k8s-ci-robot @robscott @shaneutt