-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
⚠️ Make Template in MachineSet & Spec in MachineTemplateSpec required #12420
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
⚠️ Make Template in MachineSet & Spec in MachineTemplateSpec required #12420
Conversation
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main |
/assign @JoelSpeed @fabriziopandini @sivchari |
// +optional | ||
Template MachineTemplateSpec `json:"template,omitempty"` | ||
// +required | ||
Template MachineTemplateSpec `json:"template"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The two fields in the MachineTemplateSpec
are both currently optional, seems this won't achieve much without making the spec
inside the template required?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point, thx. I'll look into it
c99ba51
to
88625bc
Compare
Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer [email protected]
88625bc
to
19f51c9
Compare
@JoelSpeed PTAL :) |
/lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 85fe0e3a0b9e5ac24838bf61d8727118c1c0b62c
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer [email protected]
What this PR does / why we need it:
Just doesn't make sense for this to be optional
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Part of #10852