Skip to content

Conversation

fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini commented Jun 25, 2025

What this PR does / why we need it:
#12231 dropped DefaulterRemoveUnknownOrOmitableFields from all mutating web hook.

Before the alpha release, #12290 partially reverted this change because we were observing issue in KCP.

Now, after triaging the issue in KCP, and opened #12402 to fix it, we can finally drop DefaulterRemoveUnknownOrOmitableFields mutating webhook option (again).

Additionally, this PR adds a unit test that proves that dropping DefaulterRemoveUnknownOrOmitableFields do not lead to rollouts or infinite reconciles in the topology controller.

However, in case you have patches generating omitable fields like e.g. an empty string, or an empty array, this might lead to rollouts when you rebase to a cluster class using v1beta2 references (or you change a cluster class in place, which is not recommended).

/area clusterclass

Part of #10852

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/clusterclass Issues or PRs related to clusterclass cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 25, 2025
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-latestk8s-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-mink8s-main
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-upgrade-1-33-1-34-main

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini force-pushed the drop-DefaulterRemoveUnknownOrOmitableFields branch from 010219e to f109de6 Compare June 26, 2025 08:01
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini added the tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. label Jun 27, 2025
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/approve

/assign @sivchari

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 27, 2025
@sivchari
Copy link
Member

Thx!

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 27, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: c4497535825c2c8fc13db346371bb6c7f460ba9e

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit d1ed8dc into kubernetes-sigs:main Jun 27, 2025
19 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.11 milestone Jun 27, 2025
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini deleted the drop-DefaulterRemoveUnknownOrOmitableFields branch July 22, 2025 14:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/clusterclass Issues or PRs related to clusterclass cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants