-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
Support for IPv6 and NLB #1677
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for IPv6 and NLB #1677
Conversation
Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). 📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA. It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1677 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 46.11% 46.19% +0.08%
==========================================
Files 110 110
Lines 5920 5933 +13
==========================================
+ Hits 2730 2741 +11
- Misses 2926 2927 +1
- Partials 264 265 +1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
/check-cla |
2 similar comments
/check-cla |
/check-cla |
I appreciate your efforts, thanks. Changes look good, I'm requesting for additional changes
|
Fixes #1655 |
Just updated the documentation. We've test these changes in one of our AWS accounts and verified that adding, changing, or removing the annotation reflects on the NLB. Do we need a unit/integration test for that? If so, is there a test already setup that I can use as an example? |
This is good enough for now. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
thanks for contributing. 👍
We'll need follow up changes to make this work for perserveSourceIP feature.
However, this is good for now since perserveSourceIP is not going to release before reinvent.
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: csnitker, kishorj, M00nF1sh The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Ah, awesome! We were using these docs instead of the one you linked. We will try the v2.1.0 release. Thank you! |
* Added dualstack support for NLB * Removed unneeded import * add tests * minor formatting changes * remove blank line * Update docs for ip address type * Corrected address type documentation * Corrected address type documentation * Corrected address type documentation Co-authored-by: Keith B. Perry <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Keith Perry <[email protected]>
service.beta.kubernetes.io/aws-load-balancer-ip-address-type: (ipv4|dualstack)
annotation for NLBImplements #1655