Skip to content

Conversation

@DanielRivers
Copy link
Member

@DanielRivers DanielRivers commented Sep 2, 2024

Explain your changes

  • Refactor of code layout
  • Extended tests
  • Added utilities
    • extractAuthResults
    • generateRandomString
  • Breaking: Update, generateAuthUrl, now return stat, nonce and url in an object
  • Added chromeStore which users chrome.store.local

Note: Drop in test coverage as mocking chrome storage is missing, this will come soon. Tested on a chrome extension application to verify working.

Checklist

🛟 If you need help, consider asking for advice over in the Kinde community.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve a restructuring of the codebase, including the consolidation of utility function tests and the introduction of new utility files for functionalities such as Base64 URL encoding, authentication URL generation, and session management. The lib/main.ts file now serves as the primary export hub for various modules, and the library entry point configuration has been updated accordingly.

Changes

Files Change Summary
lib/main.test.ts, lib/main.ts Removed individual utility function tests; consolidated tests to verify exports from the index module and re-exported utilities from types, utils, and sessionManager.
lib/sessionManager/index.ts Removed documentation for storePassword; added export for ChromeStore.
lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.test.ts, lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts Introduced tests for ChromeStore class, covering session storage operations.
lib/sessionManager/stores/memory.ts Simplified handling of string values in setItem method.
lib/utils/base64UrlEncode.test.ts, lib/utils/base64UrlEncode.ts Added utility function for Base64 URL encoding with corresponding tests.
lib/utils/extractAuthResults.test.ts, lib/utils/extractAuthResults.ts Introduced function to extract authentication results from URLs with tests.
lib/utils/generateAuthUrl.test.ts, lib/utils/generateAuthUrl.ts Added function to generate authentication URLs with tests for various scenarios.
lib/utils/generateRandomString.test.ts, lib/utils/generateRandomString.ts Introduced utility for generating random strings with tests.
lib/utils/index.ts Created an index file to re-export utility functions for easier access.
lib/utils/mapLoginMethodParamsForUrl.test.ts, lib/utils/mapLoginMethodParamsForUrl.ts Added function to map login method parameters for URL encoding with tests.
lib/utils/sanatizeUrl.ts Introduced utility function to sanitize URLs by removing trailing slashes.
vite.config.ts Changed the library entry point from lib/index.ts to lib/main.ts.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant MainModule as Main
    participant Utils as Utilities
    participant SessionManager as SessionManager

    Client->>Main: Import utilities
    Main->>Utilities: Re-export functions
    Utilities->>Client: Provide utility functions
    Client->>SessionManager: Manage session data
    SessionManager->>Utilities: Use utility functions as needed
Loading

Tip

We have updated our review workflow to use the Anthropic's Claude family of models. Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 6

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
lib/utils/generateRandomString.ts (1)

12-14: LGTM!

The dec2hex function is correctly implemented and follows best practices.

Consider marking the function as private to indicate that it's only used within this module:

-function dec2hex(dec: number) {
+private function dec2hex(dec: number) {
   return dec.toString(16).padStart(2, "0");
 }
lib/utils/generateAuthUrl.ts (1)

5-10: Add a description and document the parameters in the JSDoc.

The JSDoc comment is missing a description of the function and its parameters. Please add a description and document the parameters, including their types and default values.

Apply this diff to update the JSDoc comment:

/**
+ * Generates an authentication URL with a state and nonce.
+ * 
  * @param options
+ * @param domain - The domain of the authentication server.
+ * @param type - The type of the authentication flow. Defaults to `IssuerRouteTypes.login`.
+ * @param options - The options for the authentication flow. See `LoginOptions` for details.
  * @returns URL to redirect to
+ * @returns An object containing the generated `url`, `state`, and `nonce`.
  */
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 048a4cb and 582f818.

Files ignored due to path filters (2)
  • package.json is excluded by !**/*.json
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml, !**/*.yaml
Files selected for processing (19)
  • lib/main.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • lib/main.ts (1 hunks)
  • lib/sessionManager/index.ts (2 hunks)
  • lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts (1 hunks)
  • lib/sessionManager/stores/memory.ts (1 hunks)
  • lib/utils/base64UrlEncode.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • lib/utils/base64UrlEncode.ts (1 hunks)
  • lib/utils/extractAuthResults.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • lib/utils/extractAuthResults.ts (1 hunks)
  • lib/utils/generateAuthUrl.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • lib/utils/generateAuthUrl.ts (1 hunks)
  • lib/utils/generateRandomString.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • lib/utils/generateRandomString.ts (1 hunks)
  • lib/utils/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • lib/utils/mapLoginMethodParamsForUrl.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • lib/utils/mapLoginMethodParamsForUrl.ts (1 hunks)
  • lib/utils/sanatizeUrl.ts (1 hunks)
  • vite.config.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
  • lib/main.ts
  • lib/utils/base64UrlEncode.ts
  • lib/utils/index.ts
  • lib/utils/sanatizeUrl.ts
Additional context used
Biome
lib/utils/extractAuthResults.test.ts

[error] 5-5: Don't focus the test.

The 'only' method is often used for debugging or during implementation. It should be removed before deploying to production.
Consider removing 'only' to ensure all tests are executed.
Unsafe fix: Remove focus from test.

(lint/suspicious/noFocusedTests)


[error] 16-16: Don't focus the test.

The 'only' method is often used for debugging or during implementation. It should be removed before deploying to production.
Consider removing 'only' to ensure all tests are executed.
Unsafe fix: Remove focus from test.

(lint/suspicious/noFocusedTests)

lib/main.test.ts

[error] 7-7: Don't focus the test.

The 'only' method is often used for debugging or during implementation. It should be removed before deploying to production.
Consider removing 'only' to ensure all tests are executed.
Unsafe fix: Remove focus from test.

(lint/suspicious/noFocusedTests)

Additional comments not posted (41)
lib/utils/extractAuthResults.ts (1)

1-12: LGTM!

The extractAuthResults function is implemented correctly and follows best practices:

  • It uses the URLSearchParams API to parse the search parameters, which is a standard and efficient way to handle URL parameters.
  • It uses object destructuring to create the result object, which is a clean and readable way to create objects with dynamic keys.
  • It converts the expires_in value to a number using the + operator, which is a concise way to convert a string to a number.
  • It handles the case where expires_in might be undefined by providing a default value of 0.

The code changes are approved.

lib/utils/generateRandomString.ts (2)

1-5: LGTM!

The JSDoc comment is clear and informative.


6-10: LGTM!

The generateRandomString function is correctly implemented and follows best practices:

  • It uses the built-in crypto module to generate cryptographically strong random values.
  • The default length of 28 is a reasonable choice for a random string.
  • The conversion to a hex string is done correctly.
lib/sessionManager/index.ts (2)

Line range hint 3-12: Verify the reason for removing the storePassword documentation.

The documentation for the storePassword property has been removed from storageSettings. Please ensure that this removal is intentional and aligns with any changes in how the password is handled or documented.

Confirm that the functionality related to storePassword is still intact and working as expected, despite the removal of the documentation.

Tools
GitHub Check: main (20.x)

[failure] 3-3:
Property 'storePassword' is missing in type '{ keyPrefix: string; maxLength: number; }' but required in type 'StorageSettingsType'.


17-17: LGTM!

The new export statement for ChromeStore is a valuable addition that expands the available storage options. This change enhances the module's functionality and flexibility by allowing the use of Chrome's storage capabilities alongside the existing memory storage.

vite.config.ts (1)

9-9: Approve the change in the entry point.

The change in the entry point from lib/index.ts to lib/main.ts is approved.

Verify the existence and validity of the lib/main.ts file as the new entry point for the library. Run the following script:

Verification successful

The lib/main.ts file is a valid entry point.

The lib/main.ts file exists and is correctly set up to serve as the main entry point for the library by re-exporting modules from ./types, ./utils, and ./sessionManager. This confirms that the change in the entry point is valid.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the existence and validity of the `lib/main.ts` file.

# Test: Check if the `lib/main.ts` file exists. Expect: The file exists.
if [ -f "lib/main.ts" ]; then
  echo "The lib/main.ts file exists."
else
  echo "The lib/main.ts file does not exist."
  exit 1
fi

# Test: Check if the `lib/main.ts` file exports the necessary entities. Expect: The file exports the necessary entities.
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 634


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Display the contents of the `lib/main.ts` file to verify its setup.

# Check if the `lib/main.ts` file exists and display its contents.
if [ -f "lib/main.ts" ]; then
  echo "Contents of lib/main.ts:"
  cat "lib/main.ts"
else
  echo "The lib/main.ts file does not exist."
fi

Length of output: 185

lib/utils/mapLoginMethodParamsForUrl.ts (1)

4-27: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The function is correctly implemented and follows best practices.

lib/utils/base64UrlEncode.test.ts (5)

5-10: LGTM!

The test case is correctly implemented and the expected output matches the actual output.


12-17: LGTM!

The test case is correctly implemented and the expected output matches the actual output.


19-24: LGTM!

The test case is correctly implemented and the expected output matches the actual output.


26-31: LGTM!

The test case is correctly implemented and the expected output matches the actual output.


33-38: LGTM!

The test case is correctly implemented and the expected output matches the actual output.

lib/utils/generateRandomString.test.ts (5)

5-9: LGTM!

The test case correctly verifies that the generated string has the specified length.


11-19: LGTM!

The test case correctly verifies that the generated string contains only valid characters.


21-26: LGTM!

The test case correctly verifies that the function generates different strings on subsequent calls.


28-32: LGTM!

The test case correctly verifies that the function handles a length of 0 correctly.


34-38: LGTM!

The test case correctly verifies that the function handles a large length correctly.

lib/utils/generateAuthUrl.ts (1)

1-42: LGTM!

The code changes are approved. The function is well-structured and follows a clear logic flow. It handles various options and generates a random state and nonce for security purposes.

lib/main.test.ts (4)

8-12: LGTM!

The test case is correctly implemented and serves its purpose of validating that all exports from the types module are included in the index module.


14-18: LGTM!

The test case is correctly implemented and serves its purpose of validating that all exports from the utils module are included in the index module.


20-24: LGTM!

The test case is correctly implemented and serves its purpose of validating that all exports from the sessionManager module are included in the index module.


26-53: LGTM!

The test case is correctly implemented and serves its purpose of validating that the index module does not export anything extra.

lib/sessionManager/stores/memory.ts (1)

31-35: LGTM!

The code changes in the setSessionItem method are approved:

  • Using itemKey directly for constructing the cache key simplifies the logic and appears to be a correction or enhancement.
  • Adding an explicit return statement after the forEach loop enhances readability and clarifies the control flow.
lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts (5)

1-3: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.


5-15: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.


21-21: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.


26-28: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.


36-53: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

lib/utils/mapLoginMethodParamsForUrl.test.ts (6)

7-38: LGTM!

The test case comprehensively covers the mapping of login method parameters to URL parameters. It provides a good set of input parameters and verifies the expected output.


40-53: LGTM!

The test case verifies that the mapLoginMethodParamsForUrl function correctly handles missing optional parameters. It ensures that the function does not include the missing parameters in the output.


55-67: LGTM!

The test case verifies that the mapLoginMethodParamsForUrl function uses the default scope when the scope parameter is not provided. It ensures that the function includes the default scope in the output.


69-81: LGTM!

The test case verifies that the mapLoginMethodParamsForUrl function sanitizes the redirect URL by removing any trailing slashes. It ensures that the function correctly handles the redirect URL in the output.


83-97: LGTM!

The test case verifies that the mapLoginMethodParamsForUrl function correctly handles boolean values by converting them to string values in the output. It ensures that the function properly maps the boolean parameters.


99-120: LGTM!

The test case verifies that the mapLoginMethodParamsForUrl function removes any parameters with undefined values from the output. It ensures that the function correctly handles scenarios where all parameters are undefined.

lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.test.ts (2)

9-46: LGTM! Enable the tests once the mocks are implemented.

The test suite structure looks good and covers the essential functionality of the ChromeStore class. However, the tests are currently skipped due to missing mocks for chrome storage.

As mentioned earlier, please enable the tests once the mocks for chrome storage are implemented.


49-113: LGTM! Enable the tests once the mocks are implemented.

The test suite structure looks good and covers the essential functionality of the ChromeStore class, including the handling of extra keys. However, the tests are currently skipped due to missing mocks for chrome storage.

As mentioned earlier, please enable the tests once the mocks for chrome storage are implemented.

lib/utils/generateAuthUrl.test.ts (5)

6-29: LGTM!

The test case is well-written and covers the required functionality of generating the correct auth URL with the required parameters. It also checks if a nonce is generated and has the correct length.


31-52: LGTM!

The test case is well-written and covers the functionality of including the optional parameters in the generated URL if they are provided. It also checks if a nonce is generated and has the correct length.


54-72: LGTM!

The test case is well-written and covers the functionality of handling the default responseType if it is not provided. It also checks if a nonce is generated and has the correct length.


74-95: LGTM!

The test case is well-written and covers the functionality of handling the default responseType if it is not provided. It also checks if a nonce and state are generated and have the correct lengths.


97-115: Remove the duplicate test case.

This test case is a duplicate of the test case at line range 54-72. Both test cases are checking the same functionality of handling the default responseType if it is not provided.

Remove this test case to avoid redundancy in the test suite.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 582f818 and 104f3f8.

Files selected for processing (5)
  • lib/main.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • lib/sessionManager/types.ts (1 hunks)
  • lib/utils/extractAuthResults.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • lib/utils/generateAuthUrl.test.ts (1 hunks)
  • readme.md (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • lib/main.test.ts
  • lib/utils/extractAuthResults.test.ts
  • lib/utils/generateAuthUrl.test.ts
Additional context used
Markdownlint
readme.md

45-45: Punctuation: '.'
Trailing punctuation in heading

(MD026, no-trailing-punctuation)

Additional comments not posted (5)
lib/sessionManager/types.ts (2)

12-12: LGTM!

The addition of state to StorageKeys enum is a valid change. It indicates that state is a new key that will be used for storage management.


15-17: Verify the impact of removing storePassword from StorageSettingsType.

The removal of storePassword from StorageSettingsType is a breaking change. It indicates a shift in how storage settings are managed, potentially moving away from password storage.

Please ensure that:

  • The removal of storePassword is intentional and documented.
  • The impact of this change on other parts of the codebase that rely on the storePassword property is assessed and addressed.

Run the following script to verify the usage of storePassword:

Verification successful

Removal of storePassword from StorageSettingsType is safe.

The search confirmed that storePassword is not used elsewhere in the codebase. Therefore, its removal from StorageSettingsType does not impact other parts of the codebase. This change appears to be safe and does not require further action.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of `storePassword` in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the usage of `storePassword`. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type typescript $'storePassword'

Length of output: 71


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of `storePassword` in the codebase without specifying file type.

# Test: Search for the usage of `storePassword`. Expect: No occurrences.
rg 'storePassword'

Length of output: 18

readme.md (3)

30-31: LGTM!

The documentation for the extractAuthResults function is clear and concise.


32-33: LGTM!

The documentation for the generateRandomString function is clear and concise.


49-50: LGTM!

The documentation for the ChromeStore storage type is clear and concise.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 65.66265% with 57 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 75.41%. Comparing base (7d906a5) to head (34a7298).
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts 12.30% 57 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##              main       #4       +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage   100.00%   75.41%   -24.59%     
============================================
  Files            7       14        +7     
  Lines          142      240       +98     
  Branches        31       36        +5     
============================================
+ Hits           142      181       +39     
- Misses           0       59       +59     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/main.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
lib/sessionManager/index.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)
lib/sessionManager/stores/memory.ts 95.91% <100.00%> (-4.09%) ⬇️
lib/sessionManager/types.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
lib/utils/base64UrlEncode.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
lib/utils/extractAuthResults.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
lib/utils/generateAuthUrl.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
lib/utils/generateRandomString.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
lib/utils/index.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
lib/utils/mapLoginMethodParamsForUrl.ts 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 2 more

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 104f3f8 and c5b1c46.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts (1 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts

[warning] 5-15: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L5-L15
Added lines #L5 - L15 were not covered by tests


[warning] 27-28: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L27-L28
Added lines #L27 - L28 were not covered by tests


[warning] 37-53: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L37-L53
Added lines #L37 - L53 were not covered by tests


[warning] 61-72: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L61-L72
Added lines #L61 - L72 were not covered by tests


[warning] 74-75: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L74-L75
Added lines #L74 - L75 were not covered by tests


[warning] 83-89: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L83-L89
Added lines #L83 - L89 were not covered by tests

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts (1)

85-112: Remove the console.log statements.

The console.log statements at lines 88-93 and 99-105 seem to be used for debugging. Please remove them as they are not needed in production code.

Apply this diff to remove the console.log statements:

   async removeSessionItem(itemKey: V | StorageKeys): Promise<void> {
     // remove items from the chrome.storage
     let index = 0;
-    console.log(
-      `${storageSettings.keyPrefix}${String(itemKey)}${index}`,
-      await getStorageValue(
-        `${storageSettings.keyPrefix}${String(itemKey)}${index}`,
-      ),  
-    );
     while (
       (await getStorageValue(
         `${storageSettings.keyPrefix}${String(itemKey)}${index}`,
       )) !== undefined
     ) {
-      console.log(
-        "removing",
-        `${storageSettings.keyPrefix}${String(itemKey)}${index}`,
-        await getStorageValue(
-          `${storageSettings.keyPrefix}${String(itemKey)}${index}`,
-        ),
-      );
       await chrome.storage.local.remove(
         `${storageSettings.keyPrefix}${String(itemKey)}${index}`,
       );

       index++;
     }
   }
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 87-108: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L87-L108
Added lines #L87 - L108 were not covered by tests


[warning] 110-112: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L110-L112
Added lines #L110 - L112 were not covered by tests

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between c5b1c46 and 58324a5.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts (1 hunks)
  • lib/sessionManager/stores/memory.ts (1 hunks)
  • readme.md (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • lib/sessionManager/stores/memory.ts
  • readme.md
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts

[warning] 5-15: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L5-L15
Added lines #L5 - L15 were not covered by tests


[warning] 27-28: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L27-L28
Added lines #L27 - L28 were not covered by tests


[warning] 37-39: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L37-L39
Added lines #L37 - L39 were not covered by tests


[warning] 41-41: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L41
Added line #L41 was not covered by tests


[warning] 43-56: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L43-L56
Added lines #L43 - L56 were not covered by tests


[warning] 64-75: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L64-L75
Added lines #L64 - L75 were not covered by tests


[warning] 77-78: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L77-L78
Added lines #L77 - L78 were not covered by tests


[warning] 87-108: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L87-L108
Added lines #L87 - L108 were not covered by tests


[warning] 110-112: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L110-L112
Added lines #L110 - L112 were not covered by tests

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 58324a5 and 34a7298.

Files selected for processing (3)
  • lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts (1 hunks)
  • lib/sessionManager/stores/memory.ts (1 hunks)
  • readme.md (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • lib/sessionManager/stores/memory.ts
  • readme.md
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts

[warning] 5-15: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L5-L15
Added lines #L5 - L15 were not covered by tests


[warning] 27-28: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L27-L28
Added lines #L27 - L28 were not covered by tests


[warning] 37-39: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L37-L39
Added lines #L37 - L39 were not covered by tests


[warning] 41-41: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L41
Added line #L41 was not covered by tests


[warning] 43-56: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L43-L56
Added lines #L43 - L56 were not covered by tests


[warning] 64-75: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L64-L75
Added lines #L64 - L75 were not covered by tests


[warning] 77-78: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L77-L78
Added lines #L77 - L78 were not covered by tests


[warning] 87-98: lib/sessionManager/stores/chromeStore.ts#L87-L98
Added lines #L87 - L98 were not covered by tests

@DanielRivers DanielRivers merged commit cea02c2 into main Sep 4, 2024
@DanielRivers DanielRivers deleted the feat/refactor branch September 4, 2024 09:58
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 12, 2024
2 tasks
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 23, 2024
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants