refactor: use a more straightforward return value

[beforetech]

Proposed changes

use a more straightforward return value

---

Types of changes

• Bug fix
• New feature added
• Documentation Update

---

Please make sure to follow these points

• I have read the contributing guidelines.
• I have performed a self-review of my own code or work.
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
• My changes generates no new warnings.
• My Pull Request title is in format < issue name > eg Added links in the documentation.
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
• My changes have sufficient code coverage (unit, integration, e2e tests).

---

Screenshots (If Applicable)

---

Other Information

Any message for the reviewer or kick off the discussion by explaining why you considered this particular solution, any alternatives etc.

[EnriqueL8]

Looks good

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.96%. Comparing base (83e4cbe) to head (16324aa).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1642   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.96%   99.96%           
=======================================
  Files         342      342           
  Lines       30439    30439           
=======================================
  Hits        30427    30427           
  Misses          8        8           
  Partials        4        4           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[beforetech]

Thanks for your review.