Skip to content

Conversation

larry-safran
Copy link
Contributor

fixes #10490

@@ -288,8 +281,7 @@ private static StatusRuntimeException toStatusRuntimeException(Throwable t) {
private static RuntimeException cancelThrow(ClientCall<?, ?> call, Throwable t) {
try {
call.cancel(null, t);
} catch (Throwable e) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assertion can be disabled. So this change may skip logging some error messages, its safer to not change it.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The assertion is checking for checked exceptions, which should't happen. Catching Throwable was because this was written before we could write RuntimeException | Error. I'm not worried about this change.

Copy link
Member

@YifeiZhuang YifeiZhuang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only a minor comment.
cc. @ejona86

@@ -288,8 +281,7 @@ private static StatusRuntimeException toStatusRuntimeException(Throwable t) {
private static RuntimeException cancelThrow(ClientCall<?, ?> call, Throwable t) {
try {
call.cancel(null, t);
} catch (Throwable e) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The assertion is checking for checked exceptions, which should't happen. Catching Throwable was because this was written before we could write RuntimeException | Error. I'm not worried about this change.

@larry-safran larry-safran merged commit 55c5040 into grpc:master Aug 18, 2023
larry-safran added a commit to larry-safran/grpc-java that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2023
* Remove ThreadlessExecutor from BlockingServerStream

fixes grpc#10490
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 17, 2023
@larry-safran larry-safran deleted the removeThreadless branch February 27, 2024 00:46
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

server-side streaming must call hasNext() before cancel
3 participants