Skip to content

Scope CKKS parameter selection #2126

@j2kun

Description

@j2kun

We have discussed CKKS parameter selection for a while, but I wanted to collect some thoughts in an issue to help us decide what to do next.

Maybe if we get a SimFHE-in-the-loop pass working, we could avoid requiring intermediate value bounds and do a naive-ish sweep over the parameter space. One question I have is: if we had intermediate value bounds and a noise model like CCH+23 merged in, would SimFHE still be useful? Or would the analogous parameter selection techniques for BGV/BFV suffice for CKKS?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    dialect: ckksIssues related to the CKKS dialect

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions