-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 216
Add styled list #1725
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add styled list #1725
Conversation
Parameters styled as a list instead of text
Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA). View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information. For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @sab-i-dev, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on enhancing the readability of the runtimeOptions
parameter's documentation within the src/v1/function-builder.ts
file. The change involves reformatting the parameter descriptions from a numbered list to a more visually distinct bulleted list, along with adding extra line breaks to improve the overall clarity and presentation of the JSDoc comments.
Highlights
- Documentation Formatting: The JSDoc for the
runtimeOptions
parameter insrc/v1/function-builder.ts
has been updated. - Readability Improvement: Numbered list items (e.g., "1.
memory
") have been replaced with bullet points (e.g., "•memory
") and additional line breaks have been inserted for improved visual separation and clarity.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request updates the JSDoc for the runWith
function to use a bulleted list for the runtimeOptions
parameter, which is a good step for readability. My review provides a suggestion to use standard JSDoc list formatting and remove excessive whitespace to further improve clarity. Please also note that a similar runWith
method exists on the FunctionBuilder
class; for consistency, you might consider updating its documentation as well in a future change.
* | ||
* | ||
* • `memory`: amount of memory to allocate to the function, possible values | ||
* are: '128MB', '256MB', '512MB', '1GB', '2GB', '4GB', and '8GB'. | ||
* 2. `timeoutSeconds`: timeout for the function in seconds, possible values are | ||
* | ||
* • `timeoutSeconds`: timeout for the function in seconds, possible values are | ||
* 0 to 540. | ||
* 3. `failurePolicy`: failure policy of the function, with boolean `true` being | ||
* | ||
* • `failurePolicy`: failure policy of the function, with boolean `true` being | ||
* equivalent to providing an empty retry object. | ||
* 4. `vpcConnector`: id of a VPC connector in same project and region. | ||
* 5. `vpcConnectorEgressSettings`: when a vpcConnector is set, control which | ||
* | ||
* • `vpcConnector`: id of a VPC connector in same project and region. | ||
* | ||
* • `vpcConnectorEgressSettings`: when a vpcConnector is set, control which | ||
* egress traffic is sent through the vpcConnector. | ||
* 6. `serviceAccount`: Specific service account for the function. | ||
* 7. `ingressSettings`: ingress settings for the function, which control where a HTTPS | ||
* | ||
* • `serviceAccount`: Specific service account for the function. | ||
* | ||
* • `ingressSettings`: ingress settings for the function, which control where a HTTPS | ||
* function can be called from. | ||
* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While I appreciate the change to a list format, the implementation has a couple of issues. First, the excessive blank lines harm readability. Second, for JSDoc to correctly render a list, it's better to use hyphens (-
) or asterisks (*
) for list items instead of the bullet character (•
). Here's a suggestion that addresses both points for a more standard and readable format.
* | |
* | |
* • `memory`: amount of memory to allocate to the function, possible values | |
* are: '128MB', '256MB', '512MB', '1GB', '2GB', '4GB', and '8GB'. | |
* 2. `timeoutSeconds`: timeout for the function in seconds, possible values are | |
* | |
* • `timeoutSeconds`: timeout for the function in seconds, possible values are | |
* 0 to 540. | |
* 3. `failurePolicy`: failure policy of the function, with boolean `true` being | |
* | |
* • `failurePolicy`: failure policy of the function, with boolean `true` being | |
* equivalent to providing an empty retry object. | |
* 4. `vpcConnector`: id of a VPC connector in same project and region. | |
* 5. `vpcConnectorEgressSettings`: when a vpcConnector is set, control which | |
* | |
* • `vpcConnector`: id of a VPC connector in same project and region. | |
* | |
* • `vpcConnectorEgressSettings`: when a vpcConnector is set, control which | |
* egress traffic is sent through the vpcConnector. | |
* 6. `serviceAccount`: Specific service account for the function. | |
* 7. `ingressSettings`: ingress settings for the function, which control where a HTTPS | |
* | |
* • `serviceAccount`: Specific service account for the function. | |
* | |
* • `ingressSettings`: ingress settings for the function, which control where a HTTPS | |
* function can be called from. | |
* | |
* | |
* - `memory`: amount of memory to allocate to the function, possible values | |
* are: '128MB', '256MB', '512MB', '1GB', '2GB', '4GB', and '8GB'. | |
* - `timeoutSeconds`: timeout for the function in seconds, possible values are | |
* 0 to 540. | |
* - `failurePolicy`: failure policy of the function, with boolean `true` being | |
* equivalent to providing an empty retry object. | |
* - `vpcConnector`: id of a VPC connector in same project and region. | |
* - `vpcConnectorEgressSettings`: when a vpcConnector is set, control which | |
* egress traffic is sent through the vpcConnector. | |
* - `serviceAccount`: Specific service account for the function. | |
* - `ingressSettings`: ingress settings for the function, which control where a HTTPS | |
* function can be called from. | |
* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
without this changes the text will not be styled as a list, as it is now
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hyphens are the standard way to format a list in markdown, and should get rendered to bullet points in the reference docs. @egilmorez could you confirm?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that's right, but honestly, the only way to be 100% sure what the docgen process will do is to run it. Let me give that a go later and get back to you :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Bad news: copying sabidev's changes into a local file and generating renders this result in staging: https://firebase.devsite.corp.google.com/docs/reference/functions/firebase-functions
It's possible/likely that the "description" does not accept formatting directives like other fields; if we really want to pursue this fix, we need to ask Daniel to dig into the docgen code.
Parameters styled as a list instead of text
Description
b-261120812