Skip to content

Conversation

@mishagreenberg
Copy link

Overview -

This PR resolves the issue described in #14606. This PR makes Text components take into account the includeFontPadding property when calculating their size.

Background -

Currently, on Android, when includeFontPadding is set to false, the React Text component does not adjust its height. This makes it difficult to lay out other components at a precise spacing relative to a Text component.

iOS calculates the height of a UILabel based on the font's descent + ascent.

Android lets you choose whether to calculate the height of a TextView based on the font's top + bottom (includeFontPadding=true) or ascent + descent (includeFontPadding=false).

In order for a text component to be the same size on iOS and Android (relative to the rest of the layout in points and dips), one should set includeFontPadding=false on Android - but the React Text component needs to take this property into account when sizing itself for this to work.

Please see this stack overflow post for a visual explanation of the difference between a font's ascent/descent and top/bottom - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/27631736/meaning-of-top-ascent-baseline-descent-bottom-and-leading-in-androids-font

Testing -

Please see the attached screenshots to see the height difference of a Text component with this PR when includeFontPadding is true vs false.

The font I am using has an ascent + descent = em-size so that the height of the Text component will be equal to the font-size for a single line of text. This is to clearly show the additional height that includeFontPadding=true adds to the Text component.

For Text components that are styled in the same way,

When includeFontPadding=true, height = ~29.714 dips
When includeFontPadding=false, height= 24 dips

includefontpaddingtrue

includefontpaddingfalse

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have you on file. In order for us to review and merge your code, please sign up at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need the corporate CLA signed.

If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at [email protected]. Thanks!

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added GH Review: review-needed CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. labels Jun 19, 2017
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Facebook open source project. Thanks!

@hramos
Copy link
Contributor

hramos commented Aug 4, 2017

Thanks for submitting this. I'll see if I can get someone to review this.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the Import Started This pull request has been imported. This does not imply the PR has been approved. label Aug 8, 2017
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@achen1 has imported this pull request. If you are a Facebook employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. Import Started This pull request has been imported. This does not imply the PR has been approved.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants