ethclient: fix retrieval of pending block #31504
Merged
+37
−6
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lightclient
reviewed
May 1, 2025
ethclient/ethclient.go
Outdated
Comment on lines
+161
to
+166
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mostly added this addition here. This allows us to correctly set the sender caching. It seems like a nice thing to have, since we're returning a types.Block anyways the user can compute the block hash and it's possible they later call TransactionSender with it. Felt weird to just drop that optimization on the ground for pending blocks.
lightclient
changed the title
jakub-freebit
pushed a commit
to fblch/go-ethereum
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 3, 2025
Since the block hash is not returned for pending blocks, ethclient cannot unmarshal into RPC block. This makes hash optional on rpc block and compute the hash locally for pending blocks to correctly key the tx sender cache. https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/blob/a82303f4e3cedcebe31540a53dde4f24fc93da80/internal/ethapi/api.go#L500-L504 --------- Co-authored-by: lightclient <[email protected]>
howjmay
pushed a commit
to iotaledger/go-ethereum
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 27, 2025
Since the block hash is not returned for pending blocks, ethclient cannot unmarshal into RPC block. This makes hash optional on rpc block and compute the hash locally for pending blocks to correctly key the tx sender cache. https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/blob/a82303f4e3cedcebe31540a53dde4f24fc93da80/internal/ethapi/api.go#L500-L504 --------- Co-authored-by: lightclient <[email protected]>
gzliudan
added a commit
to gzliudan/XDPoSChain
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2025
19 tasks
gzliudan
added a commit
to XinFinOrg/XDPoSChain
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 31, 2025
gballet
pushed a commit
to gballet/go-ethereum
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 11, 2025
Since the block hash is not returned for pending blocks, ethclient cannot unmarshal into RPC block. This makes hash optional on rpc block and compute the hash locally for pending blocks to correctly key the tx sender cache. https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/blob/a82303f4e3cedcebe31540a53dde4f24fc93da80/internal/ethapi/api.go#L500-L504 --------- Co-authored-by: lightclient <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It's null in a pending block
go-ethereum/internal/ethapi/api.go
Lines 500 to 504 in a82303f