Updated preferences and FAQ documentation (added SPIFFS) #8150
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
Contributor
|
@PilnyTomas good point, have notice this as well. Can you please rename PR name to something meaningful? Less generic. For example, "Format Update of codes blocks rendering in Documentation" or something similar. Thanks |
Member
|
Is there any way to check this automatically before merging? CI/Action? |
PilnyTomas
changed the title
Contributor
Author
Maybe just make sure that code blocks don't exceed a certain length per line... |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Preferences:
A large block of code had lines beyond the visible edge and the reader was forced to scroll down to reach the vertical scroller, scroll up, see the hidden portion, then back down to scroll left and return to reading - this is unacceptable. I have folded those lines. Smaller blocks of code were left unchanged even when the code reached beyond the edge.
FAQ:
Added note about SPIFFS mount failed - based on "for reference" issue #638