Skip to content

Conversation

@fsbraun
Copy link
Member

@fsbraun fsbraun commented Oct 30, 2022

Description

This PR fixes #50.

Related resources

  • #...
  • #...

Checklist

  • I have opened this pull request against master
  • I have added or modified the tests when changing logic
  • I have followed the conventional commits guidelines to add meaningful information into the changelog
  • I have read the contribution guidelines and I have joined #workgroup-pr-review on
    Slack to find a “pr review buddy” who is going to review my pull request.

@fsbraun fsbraun requested a review from vinitkumar October 30, 2022 08:16
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 30, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #56 (680a5de) into master (f77faf9) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master       #56   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           14        14           
  Lines          160       160           
  Branches         6         6           
=========================================
  Hits           160       160           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
djangocms_file/models.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@fsbraun fsbraun changed the title Update models.py fix: Correct search field in models.py Oct 30, 2022
@marksweb marksweb merged commit be56191 into master Jul 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AbstractFile - search_fields = ('name',)

3 participants