extend travis to test python 3.3 - 3.5 #180
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi @defunkt it looks like pystache needs some love. There are a few old pull requests here and there are some other changes I'd like to propose but there's no point they won't get reviewed. Would you consider giving pystache a bit of TLC or allowing contributors? |
|
Add Python 3.6? |
|
Pretty sure this package is dead. Try https://github.com/noahmorrison/chevron instead. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
First of all thanks a lot for pystache, we're using in production and it's great.
Currently
.travis.ymlonly goes up tov3.2which is now pretty our of date. The readme says pystache is tested on 3.3, but it would also be great if pystache could officially support 3.4 and 3.5.