Skip to content

Conversation

@Rush
Copy link
Contributor

@Rush Rush commented Jun 4, 2013

I have tested both client-side and run-time setups. It seems to work fine for simple testcases. I have not done any excludeJade testing, seems I am unsure whether it works at all even without my changes but my changes should not affect anything else other than the extended syntax support. I am aware that you would like to keep changes to Jade to minimal and my changes are perfectly scriptable if one wanted to make a script to convert jade to require-jade. Enjoy! This should fix issues #10 and #11. Also issue #8 should be fixed.

@binarykitchen
Copy link

+1

@joshma
Copy link

joshma commented Mar 6, 2014

Are there any plans to merge this PR? Would love to be able to use require-jade, but lacking include/extend support is a dealbreaker. 😦

@Rush
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rush commented Mar 6, 2014

Well you are welcome to use my branch for the time being. I could look into any issues you have.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants