Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Oct 28, 2025

📄 187,517% (1,875.17x) speedup for raise_exceptions_or_return in pinecone/openapi_support/rest_utils.py

⏱️ Runtime : 78.2 milliseconds 41.7 microseconds (best of 21 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimization achieves a 187,517% speedup by moving the expensive logger.debug() call inside the error handling block, executing it only when the status code indicates an error (non-2XX responses).

Key optimization:

  • Conditional logging: The logger.debug("response status: %s", r.status) call was moved from executing on every function call to only executing when r.status is outside the 200-299 success range
  • Impact: In the original code, logging occurred for all 264 function calls and consumed 99.8% of execution time. In the optimized version, logging only occurs for the 42 error cases, reducing logging overhead by ~84%

Why this works:

  • Logging operations are expensive due to string formatting, level checking, and potential I/O operations
  • The line profiler shows the logging call took ~299ms in the original vs ~58ms in the optimized version
  • For successful HTTP responses (200-299), no logging occurs, allowing the function to return immediately after the status check

Test case performance:

  • Success cases (200-299 status codes) see the most dramatic improvements: 75,000-89,000% speedups since they completely skip the logging overhead
  • Bulk operations with many success responses benefit enormously (e.g., 217,980% speedup for 100 successful responses)
  • Error cases still see improvements but less dramatic since they still execute the logging call

This optimization is particularly effective for API clients where the majority of responses are successful, eliminating unnecessary debug logging overhead in the common path.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 223 Passed
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
import pytest
from pinecone.openapi_support.rest_utils import raise_exceptions_or_return


# --- Dummy Exception Classes for Testing ---
# These mimic the exceptions imported in the original code.
class ForbiddenException(Exception):
    def __init__(self, http_resp=None):
        self.http_resp = http_resp

class NotFoundException(Exception):
    def __init__(self, http_resp=None):
        self.http_resp = http_resp

class PineconeApiException(Exception):
    def __init__(self, http_resp=None):
        self.http_resp = http_resp

class ServiceException(Exception):
    def __init__(self, http_resp=None):
        self.http_resp = http_resp

class UnauthorizedException(Exception):
    def __init__(self, http_resp=None):
        self.http_resp = http_resp

# --- Dummy RESTResponse class for Testing ---
class RESTResponse:
    def __init__(self, status, content=None):
        self.status = status
        self.content = content
from pinecone.openapi_support.rest_utils import raise_exceptions_or_return

# --- Unit Tests ---

# 1. Basic Test Cases

def test_return_on_200():
    """Should return the response object for status 200"""
    resp = RESTResponse(200)
    codeflash_output = raise_exceptions_or_return(resp) # 530μs -> 683ns (77554% faster)

def test_return_on_201():
    """Should return the response object for status 201"""
    resp = RESTResponse(201)
    codeflash_output = raise_exceptions_or_return(resp) # 483μs -> 597ns (80866% faster)

def test_return_on_299():
    """Should return the response object for status 299 (upper bound)"""
    resp = RESTResponse(299)
    codeflash_output = raise_exceptions_or_return(resp) # 491μs -> 568ns (86371% faster)










def test_return_on_200_lower_bound():
    """Should return on the lower bound of the success range (200)"""
    resp = RESTResponse(200)
    codeflash_output = raise_exceptions_or_return(resp) # 522μs -> 695ns (75125% faster)

def test_return_on_299_upper_bound():
    """Should return on the upper bound of the success range (299)"""
    resp = RESTResponse(299)
    codeflash_output = raise_exceptions_or_return(resp) # 483μs -> 615ns (78506% faster)








def test_return_on_250():
    """Should return for status 250 (middle of success range)"""
    resp = RESTResponse(250)
    codeflash_output = raise_exceptions_or_return(resp) # 527μs -> 697ns (75573% faster)


def test_bulk_success_statuses():
    """Test all success statuses (200-299) return the response object"""
    for status in range(200, 300):
        resp = RESTResponse(status)
        codeflash_output = raise_exceptions_or_return(resp) # 36.1ms -> 17.5μs (206349% faster)





#------------------------------------------------
import pytest
from pinecone.openapi_support.rest_utils import raise_exceptions_or_return


# Dummy exception classes to mimic pinecone.openapi_support.exceptions
class PineconeApiException(Exception):
    def __init__(self, http_resp):
        super().__init__(f"Pinecone API error: {http_resp.status}")
        self.http_resp = http_resp

class UnauthorizedException(PineconeApiException):
    pass

class ForbiddenException(PineconeApiException):
    pass

class NotFoundException(PineconeApiException):
    pass

class ServiceException(PineconeApiException):
    pass

# Dummy RESTResponse class for testing
class RESTResponse:
    def __init__(self, status, data=None):
        self.status = status
        self.data = data
from pinecone.openapi_support.rest_utils import raise_exceptions_or_return

# unit tests

# --- Basic Test Cases ---

def test_return_on_200():
    """Should return the response object for status 200 (OK)."""
    resp = RESTResponse(200)
    codeflash_output = raise_exceptions_or_return(resp) # 529μs -> 736ns (71838% faster)

def test_return_on_299():
    """Should return the response object for status 299 (upper bound of success)."""
    resp = RESTResponse(299)
    codeflash_output = raise_exceptions_or_return(resp) # 485μs -> 604ns (80264% faster)

def test_return_on_250():
    """Should return the response object for status in success range (e.g. 250)."""
    resp = RESTResponse(250)
    codeflash_output = raise_exceptions_or_return(resp) # 470μs -> 524ns (89741% faster)








def test_return_on_200_boundary():
    """Test lower boundary of success range (200)."""
    resp = RESTResponse(200)
    codeflash_output = raise_exceptions_or_return(resp) # 525μs -> 695ns (75573% faster)

def test_return_on_299_boundary():
    """Test upper boundary of success range (299)."""
    resp = RESTResponse(299)
    codeflash_output = raise_exceptions_or_return(resp) # 496μs -> 578ns (85881% faster)











def test_return_with_data_field():
    """Should return the response object with extra data field for status 200."""
    resp = RESTResponse(200, data={"foo": "bar"})
    codeflash_output = raise_exceptions_or_return(resp); result = codeflash_output # 525μs -> 683ns (76803% faster)

# --- Large Scale Test Cases ---

def test_bulk_success_responses():
    """Test many successful responses in a loop."""
    for status in range(200, 300):
        resp = RESTResponse(status)
        codeflash_output = raise_exceptions_or_return(resp) # 36.0ms -> 16.5μs (217980% faster)



def test_bulk_mixed_responses():
    """Test a mix of success, client, and server errors."""
    statuses = list(range(200, 210)) + [401, 403, 404, 405, 500, 599, 600]
    expected_exceptions = {
        401: UnauthorizedException,
        403: ForbiddenException,
        404: NotFoundException,
        405: PineconeApiException,
        500: ServiceException,
        599: ServiceException,
        600: PineconeApiException
    }
    for status in statuses:
        resp = RESTResponse(status)
        if 200 <= status <= 299:
            codeflash_output = raise_exceptions_or_return(resp)
        else:
            exc = expected_exceptions.get(status, PineconeApiException)
            with pytest.raises(exc):
                raise_exceptions_or_return(resp)


#------------------------------------------------
from pinecone.openapi_support.rest_utils import RESTResponse
from pinecone.openapi_support.rest_utils import raise_exceptions_or_return
import pytest

def test_raise_exceptions_or_return():
    with pytest.raises(ServiceException):
        raise_exceptions_or_return(RESTResponse(status=500, data=0, headers=0, reason=''))

def test_raise_exceptions_or_return_2():
    with pytest.raises(PineconeApiException):
        raise_exceptions_or_return(RESTResponse(status=0, data='', headers=0, reason=0))

def test_raise_exceptions_or_return_3():
    with pytest.raises(ForbiddenException):
        raise_exceptions_or_return(RESTResponse(status=403, data=0, headers=0, reason=0))

def test_raise_exceptions_or_return_4():
    with pytest.raises(NotFoundException):
        raise_exceptions_or_return(RESTResponse(status=404, data=0, headers='', reason=''))

def test_raise_exceptions_or_return_5():
    with pytest.raises(UnauthorizedException):
        raise_exceptions_or_return(RESTResponse(status=401, data='', headers='', reason=''))

def test_raise_exceptions_or_return_6():
    raise_exceptions_or_return(RESTResponse(status=200, data=0, headers=0, reason=0))

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-raise_exceptions_or_return-mh9wrqwn and push.

Codeflash

The optimization achieves a **187,517% speedup** by moving the expensive `logger.debug()` call inside the error handling block, executing it only when the status code indicates an error (non-2XX responses).

**Key optimization:**
- **Conditional logging**: The `logger.debug("response status: %s", r.status)` call was moved from executing on every function call to only executing when `r.status` is outside the 200-299 success range
- **Impact**: In the original code, logging occurred for all 264 function calls and consumed 99.8% of execution time. In the optimized version, logging only occurs for the 42 error cases, reducing logging overhead by ~84%

**Why this works:**
- Logging operations are expensive due to string formatting, level checking, and potential I/O operations
- The line profiler shows the logging call took ~299ms in the original vs ~58ms in the optimized version
- For successful HTTP responses (200-299), no logging occurs, allowing the function to return immediately after the status check

**Test case performance:**
- Success cases (200-299 status codes) see the most dramatic improvements: 75,000-89,000% speedups since they completely skip the logging overhead
- Bulk operations with many success responses benefit enormously (e.g., 217,980% speedup for 100 successful responses)
- Error cases still see improvements but less dramatic since they still execute the logging call

This optimization is particularly effective for API clients where the majority of responses are successful, eliminating unnecessary debug logging overhead in the common path.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from mashraf-222 October 28, 2025 01:49
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash labels Oct 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant