Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Oct 25, 2025

📄 50% (0.50x) speedup for GitHubIssueReader.can_read in marimo/_cli/file_path.py

⏱️ Runtime : 12.6 microseconds 8.44 microseconds (best of 33 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimization implements short-circuit evaluation by reordering the conditions in GitHubIssueReader.can_read().

Key change: Instead of is_url(name) and name.startswith(...), the optimized version first checks if not name.startswith(...): return False before calling is_url(name).

Why this is faster:

  • Avoids expensive regex matching: The is_url() function uses a complex regex pattern that takes ~8-12 microseconds to execute. The simple string prefix check with startswith() takes only ~1-3 microseconds.
  • Early termination: For inputs that don't match the GitHub issues URL pattern (which is likely the common case), the function returns False immediately without invoking the costly regex validation.
  • Preserved logic: The optimization maintains identical behavior - both versions return True only when the input is both a valid URL and starts with the specific GitHub issues prefix.

Performance gains: The line profiler shows that is_url() calls dropped from 3 to 1, and the expensive pattern.match() operation was reduced from 3 calls (12,392ns total) to 1 call (8,200ns). This results in a 49% speedup overall.

This optimization is particularly effective for workloads with many non-GitHub URL inputs, as it eliminates unnecessary regex processing through fast string prefix filtering.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 54 Passed
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 🔘 None Found
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 2 Passed
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests and Runtime
Test File::Test Function Original ⏱️ Optimized ⏱️ Speedup
_cli/test_file_path.py::test_github_issue_reader 10.9μs 7.95μs 36.9%✅
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests and Runtime
Test File::Test Function Original ⏱️ Optimized ⏱️ Speedup
codeflash_concolic_4al8aq2a/tmp04wyzmjz/test_concolic_coverage.py::test_GitHubIssueReader_can_read 1.75μs 491ns 256%✅

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-GitHubIssueReader.can_read-mh5srq7u and push.

Codeflash

The optimization implements **short-circuit evaluation** by reordering the conditions in `GitHubIssueReader.can_read()`. 

**Key change**: Instead of `is_url(name) and name.startswith(...)`, the optimized version first checks `if not name.startswith(...): return False` before calling `is_url(name)`.

**Why this is faster**:
- **Avoids expensive regex matching**: The `is_url()` function uses a complex regex pattern that takes ~8-12 microseconds to execute. The simple string prefix check with `startswith()` takes only ~1-3 microseconds.
- **Early termination**: For inputs that don't match the GitHub issues URL pattern (which is likely the common case), the function returns `False` immediately without invoking the costly regex validation.
- **Preserved logic**: The optimization maintains identical behavior - both versions return `True` only when the input is both a valid URL and starts with the specific GitHub issues prefix.

**Performance gains**: The line profiler shows that `is_url()` calls dropped from 3 to 1, and the expensive `pattern.match()` operation was reduced from 3 calls (12,392ns total) to 1 call (8,200ns). This results in a 49% speedup overall.

This optimization is particularly effective for workloads with many non-GitHub URL inputs, as it eliminates unnecessary regex processing through fast string prefix filtering.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from mashraf-222 October 25, 2025 04:46
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash labels Oct 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants