-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Add custom fetch support to transports #1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add custom fetch support to transports #1
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @cliffhall, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request introduces a significant enhancement by allowing the SSEClientTransport and StreamableHTTPClientTransport classes to accept a custom fetch implementation. This provides greater flexibility for integrating with various network environments, enabling custom authentication flows, proxying, or leveraging specific network libraries, thereby giving users more control over how network requests are made by these transports.
Highlights
- Custom Fetch API Integration: I've added a new
fetchoption to bothSSEClientTransportOptionsandStreamableHTTPClientTransportOptions, allowing consumers to provide their ownfetch-like function for network requests. - Enhanced Network Request Control: The provided custom
fetchimplementation is now utilized for all relevant network operations within both transports, including SSE connections (GET), JSON-RPC message sending (POST), and session termination (DELETE). - Improved Test Coverage: New test cases have been added for both
SSEClientTransportandStreamableHTTPClientTransportto ensure that the customfetchimplementation is correctly used and can modify request headers, specifically for authentication.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces the ability to use a custom fetch implementation for network requests in SSEClientTransport and StreamableHTTPClientTransport. The changes look good, but I've added some suggestions to consider using the nullish coalescing operator for conciseness.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request adds support for a custom fetch implementation to the SSEClientTransport and StreamableHTTPClientTransport. I've provided suggestions to improve code maintainability and test robustness.
nullish coalescing operator ?? instead of the logical OR operator || to handle the case where this?._eventSourceInit?.fetch or this._fetch might be null or undefined but not falsy Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
nullish coalescing operator ?? instead of the logical OR operator || to handle the case where this?._eventSourceInit?.fetch or this._fetch might be null or undefined but not falsy Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
nullish coalescing operator ?? instead of the logical OR operator || to handle the case where this?._eventSourceInit?.fetch or this._fetch might be null or undefined but not falsy Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
nullish coalescing operator ?? instead of the logical OR operator || to handle the case where this?._eventSourceInit?.fetch or this._fetch might be null or undefined but not falsy Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
nullish coalescing operator ?? instead of the logical OR operator || to handle the case where this?._eventSourceInit?.fetch or this._fetch might be null or undefined but not falsy Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
- More specific expectations in test "uses custom fetch implementation from options" * In sse.ts - Import FetchLike from transport.ts * In steramableHttp.ts - Import FetchLike from transport.ts - Export StartSSEOptions interface for testing * In streamableHttp.test.ts - import StartSSEOptions from streamableHttp.ts - use StartSSEOptions instead of any in test "uses custom fetch implementation" * In transport.ts - Add FetchLike function type
|
@gemini-code-assist summary |
Summary of ChangesThis pull request significantly enhances the flexibility of the Highlights
Changelog
Activity
|
Summary
fetchoption toSSEClientTransportandStreamableHTTPClientTransportTesting
npm installnpm testhttps://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_686405a312f48331b41322eb4cee87cb