Skip to content

Conversation

@crisbeto
Copy link
Member

  • Fixes an error that is thrown during server-side rendering if an input has a type.
  • Fixes an error that was being thrown by the cdkObserveContent due to the lack of a MutationObserver.

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label Jun 11, 2017
@crisbeto
Copy link
Member Author

crisbeto commented Jun 11, 2017

@jelbourn The cdkObserveContent error is a little weird. For some reason it is logged, but ends up getting swallowed and doesn't fail the build. The same happens if I throw any kind of error inside the ngAfterContentInit.

* Fixes an error that is thrown during server-side rendering if an input has a `type`.
* Fixes an error that was being thrown by the `cdkObserveContent` due to the lack of a `MutationObserver`.
private _isTextarea() {
let nativeElement = this._elementRef.nativeElement;
return nativeElement ? nativeElement.nodeName.toLowerCase() === 'textarea' : false;
let nodeName = this._platform.isBrowser ? nativeElement.nodeName : nativeElement.name;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should add a comment that explains why this falls back to name
(also shouldn't be necessary long-term since platform-server is changing to mimic more DOM APIs)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.


<md-input-container>
<input mdInput [mdDatepicker]="birthday" placeholder="Birthday">
<input type="text" mdInput [mdDatepicker]="birthday" placeholder="Birthday">
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there any problem with leaving the type empty?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not really, I left it in there to avoid regressions.

Copy link
Member

@jelbourn jelbourn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jelbourn jelbourn added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker and removed pr: needs review labels Jun 12, 2017
@kara kara merged commit 97e35df into angular:master Jun 12, 2017
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 6, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants