Skip to content

Conversation

@crisbeto
Copy link
Member

@crisbeto crisbeto commented May 21, 2017

Switches to using async/await in the e2e tests. This should make it a bit easier to deal with Protractor's async APIs.

Note: The CI failures are unrelated to the changes in this PR and are the same as the ones from #4702 and #4703.

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement label May 21, 2017
Switches to using async/await in the e2e tests. This should make it a bit easier to deal with Protractor's async APIs.
afterEach(() => clickOn('disable'));

it('should not be able to scroll programmatically along the x axis', async (done) => {
it('should not be able to scroll programmatically along the x axis', asyncSpec(async () => {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

According to @vikerman this asyncSpec wrapper should be unnecessary w/ jasminewd2

Copy link
Member Author

@crisbeto crisbeto May 23, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm looks like it. Initially, I was playing around with passing in the done function and calling it at the end, which ended up timing out for failures, because I wasn't wrapping it in a try/catch and calling done.fail. I guess that was overriding the custom handling from jasminewd. I've removed the asyncSpec now and it behaves as expected.

@jelbourn
Copy link
Member

LGTM for the code changes, but what's up w/ the screenshot diffs here?
cc @tinayuangao

@jelbourn
Copy link
Member

Poke @tinayuangao on the screenshot stuff; not clear to me what's happening on the results page

@tinayuangao
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM.

The screenshot tests failed because we changed the test name, so the test images are unavailable to old test names.
After we merge this PR & update goldens, the images & tests should be fine.

@jelbourn jelbourn added pr: lgtm action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker and removed pr: needs review labels May 31, 2017
@mmalerba mmalerba merged commit 50f1c26 into angular:master Jun 1, 2017
@angular-automatic-lock-bot
Copy link

This issue has been automatically locked due to inactivity.
Please file a new issue if you are encountering a similar or related problem.

Read more about our automatic conversation locking policy.

This action has been performed automatically by a bot.

@angular-automatic-lock-bot angular-automatic-lock-bot bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 6, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker cla: yes PR author has agreed to Google's Contributor License Agreement

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants