Use new copy_files build mode with Flow templates

[isaacroldan]

WHY are these changes introduced?

Fixes #0000

WHAT is this pull request doing?

How to test your changes?

Post-release steps

Measuring impact

How do we know this change was effective? Please choose one:

• n/a - this doesn't need measurement, e.g. a linting rule or a bug-fix
• Existing analytics will cater for this addition
• PR includes analytics changes to measure impact

Checklist

• I've considered possible cross-platform impacts (Mac, Linux, Windows)
• I've considered possible documentationchanges

[isaacroldan]

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more

• Use new copy_files build mode with Flow templates #6309 : 2 dependent PRs (#6311 , #6341 ) 👈 (View in Graphite)
• Add new copy_files build mode #6308
• Move buildMode to specification #6305 : 1 other dependent PR (#6306 )
• Remove bundling feature #6303
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[github-actions]

Coverage report

St.❔	Category	Percentage	Covered / Total
🟡	Statements	78.57% (-0.03% 🔻)	13438/17104
🟡	Branches	72.55% (+0.01% 🔼)	6521/8988
🟡	Functions	78.83% (+0.04% 🔼)	3500/4440
🟡	Lines	78.93% (-0.04% 🔻)	12700/16091

Show new covered files 🐣

St.❔	File	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
🟢	... / flags-validation.ts	100%	100%	100%	100%

Show files with reduced coverage 🔻

St.❔	File	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
🔴	... / flow_template.ts	30.77% (-7.69% 🔻)	0%	0% (-20% 🔻)	30.77% (-7.69% 🔻)
🟢	... / urls.ts	80.41% (-1.83% 🔻)	74.29% (-3.21% 🔻)	75%	82.42% (-1.74% 🔻)
🟢	... / utilities.ts	97.96% (-0.04% 🔻)	80% (-1.82% 🔻)	80%	97.96% (-0.04% 🔻)
🔴	... / web.ts	46.43%	45.83% (-0.32% 🔻)	50%	50%
🟢	... / extension.ts	90.53% (-0.1% 🔻)	74.07% (+0.86% 🔼)	92%	90.32% (-0.1% 🔻)
🟢	... / liquid.ts	94.29%	81.25% (-6.25% 🔻)	100%	94.12%
🟡	... / local.ts	70% (-1.15% 🔻)	57.45% (-3.34% 🔻)	57.14%	70% (-1.15% 🔻)
🔴	... / console.ts	41.67% (-3.79% 🔻)	100%	0%	41.67% (-3.79% 🔻)
🔴	... / dev.ts	18.18% (-4.04% 🔻)	0%	0%	18.18% (-4.04% 🔻)
🔴	... / info.ts	20% (-3.08% 🔻)	0%	0%	20% (-3.08% 🔻)
🔴	... / profile.ts	29.41% (-1.84% 🔻)	0%	0%	29.41% (-1.84% 🔻)
🔴	... / theme-ui.ts	47.37% (-21.86% 🔻)	36.36% (-20.78% 🔻)	80% (-20% 🔻)	47.37% (-21.86% 🔻)

Test suite run success

3196 tests passing in 1345 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 7c0d909

[github-actions]

Differences in type declarations

We detected differences in the type declarations generated by Typescript for this branch compared to the baseline ('main' branch). Please, review them to ensure they are backward-compatible. Here are some important things to keep in mind:

• Some seemingly private modules might be re-exported through public modules.
• If the branch is behind main you might see odd diffs, rebase main into this branch.

New type declarations

We found no new type declarations in this PR

Existing type declarations

packages/cli-kit/dist/public/node/base-command.d.ts

@@ -32,17 +32,4 @@ export declare function addFromParsedFlags(flags: {
     path?: string;
     verbose?: boolean;
 }): Promise<void>;
-/**
- * Strips the defaults from configured flags. For example, if flags contains:
- *
- * 
- *
- * it becomes:
- *
- * 
- *
- * If we parse using this configuration, the only specified flags will be those
- * the user actually passed on the command line.
- */
-export declare function noDefaultsOptions<TFlags extends FlagOutput, TGlobalFlags extends FlagOutput, TArgs extends ArgOutput>(options: Input<TFlags, TGlobalFlags, TArgs> | undefined): Input<TFlags, TGlobalFlags, TArgs> | undefined;
 export default BaseCommand;
\ No newline at end of file