Skip to content

Conversation

@YingboMa
Copy link
Member

Note that we can infer D(x) = D(y) from x = y, but we cannot infer x = y from D(x) = D(y), so using the lowest variable in the connector provides more information to the compiler.

Note that we can infer `D(x) = D(y)` from `x = y`, but we cannot infer
`x = y` from `D(x) = D(y)`, so using the lowest variable in the
connector provides more information to the compiler.
Copy link

@ai-maintainer ai-maintainer bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

AI-Maintainer Review for PR - Use lowest order differentiated variables to improve state selection

Title and Description 👍

The title and description are clear and concise

The title and description of the pull request are clear and concise. They effectively communicate the purpose of the changes, which is to improve state selection by using the lowest order differentiated variables. However, it would be beneficial to provide more context and specific examples to better understand the motivation behind the changes.

Scope of Changes 👍

The changes are narrowly focused

The changes are narrowly focused on a specific issue. The changes mainly involve importing a different module (TranslationalPosition instead of Translational) and modifying the component definitions in the MultiBody2D module. These changes seem to be aimed at improving state selection by using the lowest order differentiated variables.

Testing 👎

Testing details are missing

The description does not mention how the author tested the changes. It would be beneficial for the author to provide information about the testing approach they used to ensure the correctness and effectiveness of the changes. This could include details about any unit tests, integration tests, or specific scenarios that were used to validate the modifications.

Documentation 👎

Docstrings are missing for some entities

Based on the provided diff, the following functions, classes, or methods do not have docstrings:

  • MultiBody2D module
  • Force model

It is recommended to add docstrings to these entities to describe their behavior, arguments, and return values.

Recommended Changes

  • Please add docstrings to the MultiBody2D module and Force model to describe their behavior, arguments, and return values.
  • Please provide information about how you tested the changes. This could include details about any unit tests, integration tests, or specific scenarios that were used to validate the modifications.

Reviewed with AI Maintainer

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 21, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #212 (4526995) into main (5944672) will decrease coverage by 0.31%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #212      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   55.30%   55.00%   -0.31%     
==========================================
  Files          48       48              
  Lines        1611     1620       +9     
==========================================
  Hits          891      891              
- Misses        720      729       +9     
Files Changed Coverage Δ
src/Blocks/math.jl 95.00% <ø> (ø)
src/Mechanical/MultiBody2D/MultiBody2D.jl 100.00% <ø> (ø)
src/Mechanical/MultiBody2D/components.jl 0.00% <ø> (ø)
src/Mechanical/TranslationalPosition/components.jl 26.66% <ø> (-2.97%) ⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@YingboMa
Copy link
Member Author

I will update MTK test once this PR is merged.

@YingboMa YingboMa merged commit 6016d78 into main Aug 22, 2023
@YingboMa YingboMa deleted the myb/link branch August 22, 2023 20:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants