Skip to content

Conversation

bdferris-v2
Copy link
Collaborator

We want to avoid running out of heap memory when processing large feeds.

Closes #1304.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

✅ Rule acceptance tests passed.
New Errors: 0 out of 1389 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
Dropped Errors: 0 out of 1389 datasets (~0%) are invalid due to code change, which is less than the provided threshold of 1%.
0 out of 1389 sources (~0 %) are corrupted.
Commit: e664550
Download the full acceptance test report here (report will disappear after 90 days).
✅ Rule acceptance tests passed.

@fredericsimard fredericsimard merged commit 9a8d610 into master Jan 31, 2023
@fredericsimard fredericsimard deleted the issue/1304/large-feeds branch January 31, 2023 18:53
KClough pushed a commit to JarvusInnovations/gtfs-validator that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2023
…tyData#1320)

* Bump validation workflows to use large machine instances to avoid running out of heap memory when processing large feeds.

Closes MobilityData#1304.

* Try using a label instead.

* label => labels

* Try yet another runner syntax.
KClough pushed a commit to JarvusInnovations/gtfs-validator that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2023
…tyData#1320)

* Bump validation workflows to use large machine instances to avoid running out of heap memory when processing large feeds.

Closes MobilityData#1304.

* Try using a label instead.

* label => labels

* Try yet another runner syntax.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

GitHub workflow action failures for large feeds

2 participants