Skip to content

Conversation

brunoagretti
Copy link
Member

@brunoagretti brunoagretti commented Jul 28, 2025

Fix #182

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved handling of custom value providers in grid columns to ensure correct value extraction, including proper support for custom null value substitutions.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 28, 2025

Walkthrough

The extractValueFromColumn method in GridExporter.java was updated to ensure that when a custom value provider is present, its returned value—including null—is used directly, with an immediate return. If the value is null and a nullValueSupplier exists, its value is used. The fallback logic is now bypassed in these cases.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
GridExporter: Value Provider Handling
src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/gridexporter/GridExporter.java
Modified extractValueFromColumn to immediately return the value from a custom value provider (or its nullValueSupplier), ensuring no fallback to other sources when a custom provider is set.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~7 minutes

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Respect custom ValueProvider return value, even if null; do not fall back to other sources (#182)

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9a49c19 and 7acca91.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/gridexporter/GridExporter.java (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: javier-godoy
PR: FlowingCode/GridExporterAddon#143
File: src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/gridexporter/GridExporter.java:315-315
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:28:24.972Z
Learning: In the `GridExporter` class, CSV exports are not subject to concurrent controls, so `getCsvStreamResource` returns a `StreamResource` instead of a `GridExporterStreamResource`.
Learnt from: javier-godoy
PR: FlowingCode/GridExporterAddon#143
File: src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/gridexporter/GridExporter.java:315-315
Timestamp: 2024-09-26T18:26:03.345Z
Learning: In the `GridExporter` class, CSV exports are not subject to concurrent controls, so `getCsvStreamResource` returns a `StreamResource` instead of a `GridExporterStreamResource`.
src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/gridexporter/GridExporter.java (2)

Learnt from: javier-godoy
PR: #143
File: src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/gridexporter/GridExporter.java:315-315
Timestamp: 2024-10-08T21:28:24.972Z
Learning: In the GridExporter class, CSV exports are not subject to concurrent controls, so getCsvStreamResource returns a StreamResource instead of a GridExporterStreamResource.

Learnt from: javier-godoy
PR: #143
File: src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/gridexporter/GridExporter.java:315-315
Timestamp: 2024-09-26T18:26:03.345Z
Learning: In the GridExporter class, CSV exports are not subject to concurrent controls, so getCsvStreamResource returns a StreamResource instead of a GridExporterStreamResource.

🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/main/java/com/flowingcode/vaadin/addons/gridexporter/GridExporter.java (1)

224-230: LGTM! Correctly prioritizes custom value provider.

The implementation properly addresses issue #182 by ensuring that when a custom ValueProvider is set, its return value (including null) is respected and used directly without falling back to other value extraction mechanisms. The early return after handling the custom provider case prevents unintended overrides and gives full control to the custom provider.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix-customvp-priority

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@brunoagretti brunoagretti requested a review from mlopezFC July 28, 2025 20:47
Copy link
Member

@mlopezFC mlopezFC left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mlopezFC mlopezFC merged commit 7268e99 into master Jul 31, 2025
4 checks passed
@mlopezFC mlopezFC deleted the fix-customvp-priority branch July 31, 2025 16:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

extractValueFromColumn should respect custom ValueProvider return value, even if null

2 participants