Skip to content

Conversation

0xnm
Copy link
Member

@0xnm 0xnm commented Jun 12, 2025

What does this PR do?

The same as #2718, just branch moved directly to the repo.

Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)

  • Feature or bugfix MUST have appropriate tests (unit, integration, e2e)
  • Make sure you discussed the feature or bugfix with the maintaining team in an Issue
  • Make sure each commit and the PR mention the Issue number (cf the CONTRIBUTING doc)

@0xnm 0xnm requested review from a team as code owners June 12, 2025 08:16
@0xnm 0xnm force-pushed the xgouchet/RUM-6171/FileObserver branch from 6d02b12 to ecb5cc6 Compare June 12, 2025 08:32
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 69.81%. Comparing base (dc4ab79) to head (ecb5cc6).
Report is 19 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...al/persistence/file/batch/BatchFileOrchestrator.kt 66.67% 2 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2720      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    69.85%   69.81%   -0.04%     
===========================================
  Files          823      823              
  Lines        30626    30635       +9     
  Branches      5157     5159       +2     
===========================================
- Hits         21391    21385       -6     
- Misses        7785     7808      +23     
+ Partials      1450     1442       -8     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...al/persistence/file/batch/BatchFileOrchestrator.kt 91.67% <66.67%> (-3.30%) ⬇️

... and 35 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants