Skip to content

Conversation

@GuillaumeLagrange
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Since the os thread scheduler is orders of magnitude ahead, it makes no
sense to use thread::sleep for such small benchmarks
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Nov 5, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #147 will degrade performances by 18.18%

Comparing ci-range-failure (ffec6ee) with main (1bd1b2e)

Summary

⚡ 1 improvement
❌ 5 regressions
✅ 37 untouched
⏩ 351 skipped1

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Change
WallTime large_drop 796.3 µs 187.5 µs ×4.2
WallTime iter_with_setup 36 ns 44 ns -18.18%
WallTime iter_batched_large_input 36 ns 40 ns -10%
WallTime iter_batched_per_iteration 36 ns 40 ns -10%
WallTime iter_batched_ref_large_input 36 ns 40 ns -10%
WallTime iter_batched_ref_per_iteration 36 ns 40 ns -10%

Footnotes

  1. 351 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants